Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Institute of Actuaries (of which I am a member) is now producing a weekly analysis of “excess” deaths. So far this year to 13 April there were 25,000 deaths over what would be expected, pretty much all of them since mid-March. This is for England and Wales only - and shows a significantly higher number of deaths than current reports.

There is either a significant under-reporting of Covid-19 deaths (even allowing for those outside of hospitals) or some other big cause of additional deaths in England and Wales in the past month.

You sign up to something that tells you about death, and don't become a forum supporter of the greatest website the world has ever seen? What is the world coming to?
 
I see it on another forum I frequent as well as on here. Basically tory voters do not like facing the fact that the party that they have voted in are not handling the current situation very well and as such are being held to account.

The best thing they can come up with, bizarrely, is to have a go at Jeremy Corbyn, even though he lost the last election and has no bearing whatsoever on the current political climate.

Rather than accepting it is their choice of government who actually have the responsibility of taking care of the country, the tory voters prefer to deflect criticism away.

But did anyone really expect tory voters to 'own' this mess?

I didn't vote Tory and never have.

But stop with the rhetoric that people who did vote for them are all at fault for this.

If you haven't noticed, the left's tendency to hate and aim to shame has not achieved anything - whether it's in terms of Labour getting in, or Brexit, or whatever else.

Hardly any government in the world - regardless of political leaning - has handled this well.

Doesn't excuse our crap response, not one bit, but fed up of this obsession with blaming Joe Public. It's not worked, for the last 10 years, so stop it and come up with a better argument.
 


i'd love to be on whatever the people conducting a study into smoking protecting against a respiratory disease are

That is, I'm sorry, effing mental.

If you smoke, and are damaging your lungs, then if this virus really is a respiratory disease, then there is no chance you are in a better shape to fight it off than if you do not smoke.

So, the only other solution is that we're not being told what this virus actually is.
 

Ha ha what a load of rubbish, NPHET have brought our R0 no from 4.7 down to .5 since March and the opposition moaning about not seeing the minutes of their meetings. The Indo has really gone down the toilet as a respected objective publication in recent years, utterly inaccurate and needlessly sensationalist headline.

You know you are doing well, when they are cribbing about minutes of meetings during this.
 
A by product of smoking is that nicoteene is also an anti viral thing. When you give up smoking, which I did, you pick up bugs and infections like mad, cos your own immune system has been like a lazy teenager for years.

So it's the nicotine itself which would be the protection?

Reminds me of this :D

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top