Oh look someone who joins a discussion and immediately resorts to name calling, so I'll have to reply to you in a language you might understand ya helmet. Yearly death rate is something that can be predicted it is not working on an assumption it is actually an area of quite complex scientific research, (that means some really really really smart people are looking into this). The expected death numbers in the UK this year are about 600000 (that's a lot of zeros isn't it) most of the deaths from Covid 19 would be expected to be included in this not in addition to it. Now back to bed or you'll get grumpy later and have to go for a nap and you'll miss your cartoons. You bag licker.
I’d already read plenty of your incessant repetitive posts without replying , and your angle was clear as day. You’re patently more arsed about the fiscal impact than anything else. You’re the kind of bulb that’s prepared to apportion a capital value to life, probably because you’re currently losing out yourself.
Yearly death rate is ultimately a matter of fact, I couldn’t give a rats ass about whatever the predictions are for this year excluding COVID-19, it’s utterly irrelevant. What matters is that without the lockdown of individuals this thing would have spread through the entire population like wild fire and taken hundreds of thousands of lives in the U.K., many of who would have been lost merely because of the complete overwhelming of the system.
But here’s you intimating incessantly that the victims of this virus should be treated as little more than collateral damage because they’re often old and with underlying conditions. Because you’re putting yourself and your own fiscal position first. Which makes you a word that I’d get banned for.