Disgruntledgoat
Player Valuation: £50m
I did not post it as a scientific rebuttal. My point being that Scientists are not always right and that as each year passes our knowledge should be increasing. Back in the 60’s when Scientists declared we were going into an ice age, those scientists were at the cutting edge, they really knew their stuff and had access to technology that was state of the art. But of course looking back, they didn’t really know and their technology was pitiful compared to that now available to any five year old child. So how can anyone, today, declare with absolute certainty that they are right, when the scientists 60 years from now will have even more technology, more data and will declare with absolute certainty that the previous scientists were wrong but they are right. Do you see my point, things change, we progress, we learn.......
Why don't we just make a cleaner, more sustainable global economy on the off chance? I'm not seeing a drawback.