I was watching the Jeremy Vine show this morning and there was yet another piece about how eating meat is having a devastating effect on climate change. This latest one suggested that if you eat steak or red meat twice a week, that has the same effect on climate change as 1500 air miles.
Now I'm not disputing these figures although I do wonder sometimes who actually works these things out. I'm not even questioning the need to affect change to save the planet. I may not be fanatical enough to go on one of these marches, but I am a keen supporter of the likes of renewable energy, the need for new technology to reduce CO2 emissions, reducing plastics, recycling, saving and replenishing the worlds forests and probably, most importantly, controlling the worlds population.
No, my objection to all these headline making reports is WHY do they single out meat eaters for criticism. For instance, there are approximately 10 million cattle in the UK. Only 20% of them are reared for meat. The rest are dairy cattle. Presumably they all burp and fart the same regardless, so surely dairy products are having 4 times the effect on climate change than red meat production. And what about leather goods like shoes, bags, furniture and motor upholstery. Nobody is saying we need to stop production of any of those products What about sheep and pigs?. There are approximately 3 times more sheep than cattle in the UK and the majority of these are reared for their wool. Sheep fart don't they? Should we be banning wool too?
And where do we draw the line?. Horses, dogs, cats.?
Without in any way wanting to dismiss climate change and the need to address this, I just feel that reports such as this are more about bashing meat eaters than anything else.