Burnley Case

[DuncansPigeons]

...

View attachment 356796

Well that backfired didn’t it?!

Still the best though!

 

[Tin-Tin]

Never mind them, go and get that Nick De Marco

 

[Neiler]

I think the basis for an appeal will be based on the jurisdiction of the timeframe of the breach. We've all accepted we were in breach.

Burnley were relegated in May 22 but by the rules we werent in Breach until the 30th of June 22 that year until the ned of the financial year. On the 1st of Juy that year we were in breach, but Burnley had already been relegated.

What the panel decided is that we were in breach for the whole year 21/22 season - even though we had from the end of that season until 30th of June 22 to not be in breach - Burnley had been relegated before that.

I think or best chance of clawing this back is this argument.

If they dont accept that argument - then anyone who has had to sell players to comply with PSR in recent years in what become to be known as the PSR deadline on June 30th- Newcastle, Villa, Forest, Chelsea and ourselves - would have been in breach for the entirety of those seasons to.

 

[allen]

Yup should never of been invited. Why would anyone be clapping him

There’s literally videos of him getting dogs abuse on Goodison Road

Yep. I was there. He was fouling his unders.

He was left in absolutely no doubt what we thought about him and the Premier League.

 

[Jebus_lives]

Heard all this about that Super Silk idiot who was as much use as Dwight McNeil’s right leg.

Top banter this.

Slightly falls down when you understand that we won our appeal on the legal application of the commission in their decision, which reduced the points deduction.

But we failed on to completely overturn the ruling, because, we did in fact actually breach PSR.

And the appeal was only really considering the legal application and not whether we breached.

 

[Simo]

Yep. I was there. He was fouling his unders.

He was left in absolutely no doubt what we thought about him and the Premier League.

View attachment 356798

Booooo

 

[allen]

Booooo

That and the classic "Premier League corrupt as..." were the soundtrack to his painfully slow crawl through the crowd.

 

[DanB90]

The irony in all of this, is if we had have spent the money and in fact gained a sporting advantage by finishing say 10th upwards that season.

Burnley wouldn’t have had a case.

Instead we got rid of all our best players, didn’t replace them. Narrowly avoided relegation.
Received 2 points deductions. Sold more players. Nearly went into administration.
And now Burnley have the cheek to sue us.

Inbred little bastards.

 

[twoblue]

Never mind them, go and get that Nick De Marco

Never mind them, go and get that Nick De Marco

Get our name of that 2009 Fa Cup

 

[MKS]

Not going through 73 pages to see if anyone else is as funny as me

 

[hoppy]

In a mark of the significance of the case, Everton has brought in law firm Slaughter and May to handle its appeal against Burnley. Slaughter and May is widely considered one of the most prestigious law firms in the world, renowned as an elite member of the UK's "Magic Circle". It holds a legendary reputation for corporate law, serving more FTSE 100 and FTSE 350 companies than any other firm.

 

[Iana]

In a mark of the significance of the case, Everton has brought in law firm Slaughter and May to handle its appeal against Burnley. Slaughter and May is widely considered one of the most prestigious law firms in the world, renowned as an elite member of the UK's "Magic Circle". It holds a legendary reputation for corporate law, serving more FTSE 100 and FTSE 350 companies than any other firm.

Burnley used,and are using,King and Spalding who are about 3 times the size of Slaughter and May measured by revenue.

 

[Tipp blue]

^ Actually, I think this is with regards to appeal, but I knew I'd seen them in that doc.

I think we used Pinsent Masons and once we knew we were beat, we've brought Slaughter and May in which is their mention in the doc.

So it's not new news as the X post/article suggests.

Everton have also worked with Slaughter and May in the past.

What company did Shagger Silk work for, he ballsed up the previous cases.

 

[Tipp blue]

I think the basis for an appeal will be based on the jurisdiction of the timeframe of the breach. We've all accepted we were in breach.

Burnley were relegated in May 22 but by the rules we werent in Breach until the 30th of June 22 that year until the ned of the financial year. On the 1st of Juy that year we were in breach, but Burnley had already been relegated.

What the panel decided is that we were in breach for the whole year 21/22 season - even though we had from the end of that season until 30th of June 22 to not be in breach - Burnley had been relegated before that.

I think or best chance of clawing this back is this argument.

If they dont accept that argument - then anyone who has had to sell players to comply with PSR in recent years in what become to be known as the PSR deadline on June 30th- Newcastle, Villa, Forest, Chelsea and ourselves - would have been in breach for the entirety of those seasons to.

You are calming this to a group of men who said Everton should have foreseen the war in Ukraine, they the pannel have an agenda against Everton I'm becoming more convinced of this.

 

[Neiler]

You are calming this to a group of men who said Everton should have foreseen the war in Ukraine, they the pannel have an agenda against Everton I'm becoming more convinced of this.

Its a whole new panel for the appeal mate.