Burnley Case

[Seathestars]

Its a whole new panel for the appeal mate.

Let’s hope the panel is
Shagger Silk
Dan the Man
@davek

 

[COYBL25]

Let’s hope the panel is
Shagger Silk
Dan the Man
@davek

Good Lord no.

We`d end up in the North West Counties.

 

[Tipp blue]

Its a whole new panel for the appeal mate.

Good hopefully they wont be idiots. Is the argument you mentioned kind of innocent until proven guilty, We had done nothing wrong until after the accounts were submitted and found a breach. I'm not sure i fully understand the argument, are we calming that if we sold a player on say the 25th of June we would have been compliment, But we didn't do that and were found guilty.

 

[Iana]

Good hopefully they wont be idiots. Is the argument you mentioned kind of innocent until proven guilty, We had done nothing wrong until after the accounts were submitted and found a breach. I'm not sure i fully understand the argument, are we calming that if we sold a player on say the 25th of June we would have been compliment, But we didn't do that and were found guilty.

In the latest judgement Everton said they could have sold a player before June 30th but the prices were wholly undervalued so didn’t bother and they did not believe they had breached so saw no reason to do so.
Everton also used a previous legal case to support the point which was dismissed.

 

[Jebus_lives]

What company did Shagger Silk work for, he ballsed up the previous cases.

No he didn't.

 

[Iana]

What company did Shagger Silk work for, he ballsed up the previous cases.

The damage was done in the first hearing where we performed hopelessly and “Shagger” Silk was not involved.
He was brought in for the appeal and got 4 points back and argued for even lower but was rebuffed.

 

[blulouie]

What company did Shagger Silk work for, he ballsed up the previous cases.

He had Moshiri pulling his strings mate.
I remember Moshiri couldnt keep his mouth shut too.

Think Friedkins are totally different in their business ways .

 

[Wat Tyler]

 

[mahermi1]

Never mind them, go and get that Nick De Marco

Could you imagine how fast Masters and his premier league crew will jump to Chelsea's defence ? Convinced we will be the only club actually sued.

 

[n01efc]

What I don’t get, and I may have gotten this wrong, is that within the report at the first hearing the Panel acknowledged Everton didn’t gain any sporting advantage- therefore how have they then arrived at this?

 

[Tipp blue]

What I don’t get, and I may have gotten this wrong, is that within the report at the first hearing the Panel acknowledged Everton didn’t gain any sporting advantage- therefore how have they then arrived at this?

They said we did get a sporting advantage but how much of a sporting advantage cant be quantified.

 

[pfim]

They said we did get a sporting advantage but how much of a sporting advantage cant be quantified.

But then just quantified it with the recent decision. These must be the black sheep of the independent panelists.

 

[Rehnman]

I’ve always been strongly of the opinion that signing Neal Maupay in the summer of 2022 caused us a clear sporting disadvantage and there’s a case for us to receive compensation from all clubs we fielded him against.

 

[BullensRoad]

Surprisingly, the security advice that the board sought to prevent them attending the game, either didn't get shared or wasn't followed by Masters as he walked to the ground among Everton fans.

Probably wanted to something to happen to dig the knife on further.

 

[Iana]

Probably wanted to something to happen to dig the knife on further.

It was a clear act of provocation but Evertonians did not let him get headlines to detract from Goodison’s last men’s game.