When he jumped he didn’t aim to grab the locks. Instead he got them and let go pretty quickly. Very different from the Cleseas Sideshow Bob getting his hair pulled as an example.
Play stupid games you will win stupid prizes.
Marcus Kendall
Player Valuation: £35m
It wasn't intentional and he won the aerial battle as well so I have no idea how you can think that was a red card
You know what he was thinking and doing?
All starting to sound like RAWKs defence of Saurez.
I think it's the inconsistency that pisses people off.
A hair pull and studs half way up someone's legs should both be red cards if the hair pull is deemed so.
How do you "accidentally" tighten your fist tight enough to pull someones hair, while in mid air fighting for a ball?
The only people who thought there was an issue are the striker and officials...
At worst its a petty cynical foul, if you believe he meant it.....and it needed an eagle eye to spot it
Never in a million years is that an act of violent conduct....
And it has cause and effect, leading to the grealish reaction, if the ref did his job and prevented multiple fouls on our players then you would have seen the petulant reaction to finally getting a decision
Now hwangs challenge, sure it may have been more clumsy and reckless than violent, but it was still a challenge that by the laws of the game is a red card, from behind, high and at pace....
I'd love to know the reasons var deemed one a red card and didnt look at the other....
At worst its a petty cynical foul, if you believe he meant it.....and it needed an eagle eye to spot it
Never in a million years is that an act of violent conduct....
And it has cause and effect, leading to the grealish reaction, if the ref did his job and prevented multiple fouls on our players then you would have seen the petulant reaction to finally getting a decision
Now hwangs challenge, sure it may have been more clumsy and reckless than violent, but it was still a challenge that by the laws of the game is a red card, from behind, high and at pace....
I'd love to know the reasons var deemed one a red card and didnt look at the other....
Marcus Kendall
Player Valuation: £35m
Because he jumped and you clench your hands for maximum lift off
Bazlar
Player Valuation: £25m
34 reactions · 24 shares | Jim Keoghan on Reels
www.facebook.com
kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
That usually result in red cards
Yh, inconsistency is the big problem. I wouldn't care about 90% of calls that refs/VAR made if they were consistent. Then at least you know the rules and can play within/around them. You can't do that if they are not consistent.
kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
But everywhere pulling someone's hair is deemed a violent act.
In football, raise your hands above the neck of another opponent is gonna lead to trouble
PeregrineT
Player Valuation: £40m
Theres a 0 percent chance anyone is ever given another red card for that hair "pull". 0.2 seconds of accidentally grabbing someones hair instead of their shirt as violent conduct is insane, especially considering it had so little impact nobody even noticed until VAR called everyone's attention to it later.
Looking forward to another week of pundits either apologizing or falling over themselves to explain why this was, in fact, the super duper special exception case and somehow technically maybe correct.
Looking forward to another week of pundits either apologizing or falling over themselves to explain why this was, in fact, the super duper special exception case and somehow technically maybe correct.
Do you? Why does clenching your fists give you maximum lift off? Why does he only clench his fist in mid air? Why does he only clench the fist that happens to be wrapped around the oppo's hair?
everton1953
Player Valuation: £40m
Referee is to be suspended apparently. And yet he gets the blame for not challenging the idiots on VAR.
