Personally i think the 'we needed the Barkley cash to buy' is a red herring. Perhaps it could be we needed his wages off the payroll. (has his improved contract been taken off the table? We sign a 100k + a week forward and then Barkley accepts the contract and perhaps that blows the budget etc.) However rumours persist we would have got Giroud had his missus given the green light.
People were saying the exact same thing last year and we spent a fair whack in Jan still without selling.
I agree with the not good enough as i'm sure most would. If we were able to get a top striker/defender then we might have been pushing for the top 4. But it is easy saying it and a bit harder executing, the RS missed out on their top targets too, Chelsea? Nada. Arsenal, got a striker and nothing else.