Transfer Rumour Aaron Ramsey

[Abertonian]

Ramsey had an amazing year at Arsenal until they bought Ozil then moved him around to accomodate old bugeyes. Would be an absolutely amazing signing for us but surely we wouldn't have much of a chance.

 

[Tel001]

Yeah of course. That option involves him remaining at Arsenal for the next eight months though, and he risks getting injured during that period.

It's just like with Barkley, he could have waited a further six months and left on a free, but it seems all parties preferred a January move instead.

Has Ramsey been getting knocked out in town too?

 

[Parker]

I'm curious where he would fit in to our system. What is Ramsey, he seems to me to be a mix of everything. Kind of like a better version of Tom Davies. IF we got him who would he displace?

 

[brieverton]

I wouldn't sign him for the commitment it would take in wages, and it's a long shot anyway. Likely he'll go abroad surely.

Hopefully as things settle down, we will indulge more rarely and selectively in signing players who don't fit the bill for whatever reason at a club that is above us.

It's not how Spurs have built their squad under Pochettino, and it won't fit the sustainability model that Moshiri appears to want.

 

[Baines' left foot]

We have no chance.

That much is surely obvious but seemingly not to some.

 

[The binman chronicles]

I'm curious where he would fit in to our system. What is Ramsey, he seems to me to be a mix of everything. Kind of like a better version of Tom Davies. IF we got him who would he displace?

If we suspend disbelief and imagine we could actually get him then this is the issue as I believe he is more a number 10 than an 8. But in saying that I wouldn't mind trying a Gomes, Ramsey and Gylfi trinity. (Sounds rude and strangely I'm not disturbed by it... )

 

[Barnfred 55]

If we suspend disbelief and imagine we could actually get him then this is the issue as I believe he is more a number 10 than an 8. But in saying that I wouldn't mind trying a Gomes, Ramsey and Gylfi trinity. (Sounds rude and strangely I'm not disturbed by it... )

In certain games that would work. I'm thinking at home to teams that we know will park the bus. I'd like us to try Bernard, Gomes and Gylfi in some of those games with Bernard probably the furthest forward of the 3.

But in the majority of games I think we'll need a player like Gana anchoring the midfield. His performances on the whole this season have been of a very high level and we've missed him when he hasn't been in the team.

 

[Barnfred 55]

Not against buying Ramsey. But in the whole scheme of things, bearing in mind we also need a striker, another permanent CB and possibly even a replacement RB if Seamus doesn't get his form back, we only need to bring in one CM this summer. So it would have to be either Gomes or Ramsey. Both are top quality.

 

[Tel001]

I'm curious where he would fit in to our system. What is Ramsey, he seems to me to be a mix of everything. Kind of like a better version of Tom Davies. IF we got him who would he displace?

Erm.... tom Davies

 

[Parker]

Erm.... tom Davies

He's not in the team though. So is Ramsey sitting on the bench?

 

[Tel001]

Not against buying Ramsey. But in the whole scheme of things, bearing in mind we also need a striker, another permanent CB and possibly even a replacement RB if Seamus doesn't get his form back, we only need to bring in one CM this summer. So it would have to be either Gomes or Ramsey. Both are top quality.

I ageee with buying a striker first but also think that if we have a chance to buy a quality player that we wouldn’t usually, we must seize the opportunity even if it’s not a priority position. I mean if it’s a postition for example RB or CM as Ramsey is, a striker is number one priority but he do need a cm and RB imo and if we get the chance of signing a quality one we shouldn’t waste the chance to do so

 

[Pabbers]

He would replace Gomes, we have no chance of keeping him past the loan, imo.

 

[Tel001]

He's not in the team though. So is Ramsey sitting on the bench?

If he can’t displace gomes, gana or siggy then yeah. He’s a different player to all of them mentioned tho and I believe could play well along side any of them, he’s a really good allorunder . Lots of energy, works hard, helps out defensively , good technique and movement and Camby score a goal, if any of them got injured he could replace them and work with whoever else is playing. The one player he would struggle to replace as in the role of the team is gana, but only mcarthy has the ability to even consider that imo but he’s always broken.

 

[Simon Buttle]

He would replace Gomes, we have no chance of keeping him past the loan, imo.

There was an article the other day stating Gomes is only here for the loan and there is no option to buy unfortunatly.

 

[Barnfred 55]

I ageee with buying a striker first but also think that if we have a chance to buy a quality player that we wouldn’t usually, we must seize the opportunity even if it’s not a priority position. I mean if it’s a postition for example RB or CM as Ramsey is, a striker is number one priority but he do need a cm and RB imo and if we get the chance of signing a quality one we shouldn’t waste the chance to do so

I never said we shouldn't buy him. In fact I started the post with those exact words. What I don't think is that we should buy both him AND Gomes as I think it would unbalance the squad. One or the other. As I said, both seem to be top quality.