Current Affairs 2024 POTUS race

Status
Not open for further replies.
You really do enjoy throwing a vast blanket over subjects to suit a rather pathetic attempt to call hypocrisy, it's a very lazy argument.

Throw a few more 'mates' in there aswell please, we wouldn't want to allow your faux reasonable commentator mask to slip.

Using 'mate' is just a filler rather than typing in 'ok, wetdog69blueforever' or whatnot at the beginning of a post.

My uncle used to call people he didn't know the name of John - bus drivers, barmen etc.

Weird you seem to think it's me actually trying to say someone's a friend, not from Liverpool i guess Walken?
 
Thought her final line was amusing as hell though - we may be about to enter a period were locking up political opponents will be the way.

Given she's been one of the most vocal Democrats shouting that Trump - a political opponent - should b locked up 😂

She's an absolute clown,

OK, let us dive into the locking him up comments.

It is not because she disagrees with him or he has wronged her personally in anyway. It is because she believes she has broken the law. The comparison is just nowhere near the same. If she was saying it about Vance or any of the other people then I would agree with you, as there is nothing out there that would imply they have participated in criminal acts.

In a free society are you not allowed to have an opinion that somebody who you believe has committed a crime should be tried and punished if found guilty. In a free society it should not be allowed to go after people in the same manner if all they have done is disagree with you.
 
It is a pro Russia, pro Putin account and always follows lines to support this - even though there are attempts to disguise the intent, its generally clear enough.
Spot on Spadge Vernacular, I created an account 12 years ago as part of the Russian master plan to win over Everton supporters as a fifth column inside the UK - figured we needed to make it look believable though so had to do about 50 thousand posts on the footy forum side about how crap we've been to lay the foundation etc...

Funny though as the Ukraine issue (rather you being vitriolicky anti Russian) colours pretty much all of your views - you also seem obsessed with either tagging me in on posts, commenting on me, or jumping in to try curry favour when someone says something negative.
 
Spot on Spadge Vernacular, I created an account 12 years ago as part of the Russian master plan to win over Everton supporters as a fifth column inside the UK - figured we needed to make it look believable though so had to do about 50 thousand posts on the footy forum side about how crap we've been to lay the foundation etc...

Funny though as the Ukraine issue (rather you being vitriolicky anti Russian) colours pretty much all of your views - you also seem obsessed with either tagging me in on posts, commenting on me, or jumping in to try curry favour when someone says something negative.
I accept your admission and understand why you popped back up in the CA in the run in to the Trump election. Well played comrade. ;)

Cool down on the use of mate, la. It is making you stand out.
 
OK, let us dive into the locking him up comments.

It is not because she disagrees with him or he has wronged her personally in anyway. It is because she believes she has broken the law. The comparison is just nowhere near the same. If she was saying it about Vance or any of the other people then I would agree with you, as there is nothing out there that would imply they have participated in criminal acts.

In a free society are you not allowed to have an opinion that somebody who you believe has committed a crime should be tried and punished if found guilty. In a free society it should not be allowed to go after people in the same manner if all they have done is disagree with you.

Fair enough, thing is though until he does then it's just all hot air, if trump does target political opponents like that then yup she's valid, until he shows any signs besides gasbagging then it's just Trump spouting typical Trump crap to sound tough etc
 
I accept your admission and understand why you popped back up in the CA in the run in to the Trump election. Well played comrade. ;)

Cool down on the use of mate, la. It is making you stand out.
Well I don't come from Kirkby so not gonna be using la so you can rest easy at night.

Probably the most significant election in the US history - yeah was an interesting thing to discuss and see others POV - especially those from the US.

No worries my little Ukrop
 
I accept your admission and understand why you popped back up in the CA in the run in to the Trump election. Well played comrade. ;)

Cool down on the use of mate, la. It is making you stand out.

Interesting aside: on another major football forum I'm a guest on (none of the Luton ones count as 'major'), one of the mods there recently said they had noticed a spate of older abandoned accounts suddenly logging in again and funnily enough heading straight to their own news/current affairs section, and barely bothering to post about the club, if at all.

When you think about accounts created ~12 years ago or more, a time before common use of MFA and the like, and a broader awareness of password security, it stands to reason that a great many account details on forums like this have likely been compromised via data breaches since.

Certainly makes you wonder.
 
Fair enough, thing is though until he does then it's just all hot air, if trump does target political opponents like that then yup she's valid, until he shows any signs besides gasbagging then it's just Trump spouting typical Trump crap to sound tough etc

There is no smoke without fire and it is surely understood that some of the rhetoric is extremely dangerous, in this context. It has been proven very recently that what he says 'to apparently sound tough' has affects on the population. Springfield would not have had weeks of heavy disruption if there was no lie told to the nation.

We cannot just shrug our shoulders and say it is an old man shouting at clouds or the guy trying to sound tough down the pub saying he could easily beat Mike Tyson in a fight. His words could have devastating affects, the word here that is doing the heavy lifting is 'could'. Trump talks in facts, regardless of the fact checking. He doubled down on the lie about pets being eaten even when the person who started it said that she made it up. One word out of Trump saying it was false would have saved a lot of confusion and fear for a lot of people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top