who both should have abstained from the immunity vote, especially Thomas.
The dems do nothing. Still bringing a library book to a gunfight.
It's a ruling that will get twisted to expand the scope of presidential power to a far greater degree than Roberts probably intends. I get that Roberts still thinks Iran-Contra should have been within the scope of Reagan's power. A ruling this broad isn't the way to solve that.Unlike those living in MAGA-land, most of us don't see that as a good thing
No matter WHO the president is
I cant help but laughing at this debate. The golf segment. These men are leading the free world and they discussing their golf handicap.
No there won't. They have done exactly what they were appointed to do.I imagine there will be a hastily drafted memo from SCOTUS pretty quick when they realise what they've done.
Ha ha. It's hardly 'hair splitting' to point out that you linked an article you implied showed Newsom's endorsement of Harris for POTUS when it was actually another post he was endorsing her for.Oh so now you are suddenly for “hair splitting” and that nuance does happen in US politics!
Anyway I’ll leave you to your West Wing fantasy scenarios where Newsom can be the 2024 candidate and win.
You do know that the VP gets to be POTUS if something happens to the current incumbent- and Biden was already old when Newsom made that statement?Ha ha. It's hardly 'hair splitting' to point out that you linked an article you implied showed Newsom's endorsement of Harris for POTUS when it was actually another post he was endorsing her for.
Lol.
You do know that the VP gets to be POTUS if something happens to the current incumbent- and Biden was already old when Newsom made that statement?
Good luck trying to walk the rhetorical tightrope of “yes I supported her emphatically when there was an old white guy who was senior to her who could die at any moment but I honestly never really thought she’d make a good POTUS, vote for me”

We disagree Dave, not for the first time, won’t be the last!Yes, I do know that as VP she'd become President if anything happened to Biden in office. But to suggest that's what Newsom is endorsing her for - the Oval Office - is a tangential argument. In fact, it'd imply he's projecting ahead to that grisly outcome.
No, you've linked an article that didn't do what you thought it did for your argument.
It happens.![]()
Surely anyone who doesnt want Biden, may not like him at all, or may be thinking of abstaining in November due to his stance on Israel should be putting this above everything at the moment.
We disagree Dave, not for the first time, won’t be the last!
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.