Current Affairs 2024 POTUS race

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the President is immune? OK wake up Joe. Here's a 44 Magnum. Go for it Mr President!

I'm joking of course. Ahem.

The best thing we can hope for is that the numpties who favour this maniac might just realise what kind of nightmare they could be bringing down on their country and vote democrat.
 
I imagine there will be a hastily drafted memo from SCOTUS pretty quick when they realise what they've done.
 
Unlike those living in MAGA-land, most of us don't see that as a good thing

No matter WHO the president is
It's a ruling that will get twisted to expand the scope of presidential power to a far greater degree than Roberts probably intends. I get that Roberts still thinks Iran-Contra should have been within the scope of Reagan's power. A ruling this broad isn't the way to solve that.

If democracy is to mean anything, a later Supreme Court will have to claw some of this back, and the future president in question will have cause to call that ruling unfair targeting.

The appeals court ruling they overturned was an excellent, well-reasoned opinion that should have stood.
 
Feeling compelled to say this given my current state of fury.

We are here today because Bernie Bros could not stomach voting for Hillary Clinton. It stinks. And we again find ourselves on the precipice of another such disaster because Democrats tend not to vote for party principles/platform, they vote their emotions of the moment. It's infuriating.

I don't know if it will change the pattern, but I hope this ruling fires some people up. If left unchecked, the Trumpist/Federalist Society elements in our politics are going to continue to fundamentally re-cast American society into the wet dream of the fraudulent fundamentalist Christians and their billionaire allies.
 
Oh so now you are suddenly for “hair splitting” and that nuance does happen in US politics!

Anyway I’ll leave you to your West Wing fantasy scenarios where Newsom can be the 2024 candidate and win.
Ha ha. It's hardly 'hair splitting' to point out that you linked an article you implied showed Newsom's endorsement of Harris for POTUS when it was actually another post he was endorsing her for.

Lol.
 
Ha ha. It's hardly 'hair splitting' to point out that you linked an article you implied showed Newsom's endorsement of Harris for POTUS when it was actually another post he was endorsing her for.

Lol.
You do know that the VP gets to be POTUS if something happens to the current incumbent- and Biden was already old when Newsom made that statement?

Good luck trying to walk the rhetorical tightrope of “yes I supported her emphatically when there was an old white guy who was senior to her who could die at any moment but I honestly never really thought she’d make a good POTUS, vote for me”
 
You do know that the VP gets to be POTUS if something happens to the current incumbent- and Biden was already old when Newsom made that statement?

Good luck trying to walk the rhetorical tightrope of “yes I supported her emphatically when there was an old white guy who was senior to her who could die at any moment but I honestly never really thought she’d make a good POTUS, vote for me”

Yes, I do know that as VP she'd become President if anything happened to Biden in office. But to suggest that's what Newsom is endorsing her for - the Oval Office - is a tangential argument. In fact, it'd imply he's projecting ahead to that grisly outcome. :(

No, you've linked an article that didn't do what you thought it did for your argument.

It happens. 🤷‍♂️
 
Yes, I do know that as VP she'd become President if anything happened to Biden in office. But to suggest that's what Newsom is endorsing her for - the Oval Office - is a tangential argument. In fact, it'd imply he's projecting ahead to that grisly outcome. :(

No, you've linked an article that didn't do what you thought it did for your argument.

It happens. 🤷‍♂️
We disagree Dave, not for the first time, won’t be the last!
 
Surely anyone who doesnt want Biden, may not like him at all, or may be thinking of abstaining in November due to his stance on Israel should be putting this above everything at the moment.


They should, but again that is still a one-way street - every US voter is being told they must do this, how absolutely important (vital, even) it is to the health of the nation that they get out and vote to stop Trump. All of their concerns aren't as important as stopping that man from doing what he wants to, which almost everyone should absolutely focus on.

Meanwhile it is fine for Biden to carry on, just as it was fine for RBG to carry on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top