@Pittsburgh Footy, @Prevenger17 I don’t disagree on the risks of Harris - think the Biden camp shares them which is one reason why we are where we are.
@Martin Alvito you are right, “nominate” is the wrong language, I should have said “publicly support”. Because he couldn’t visibly support another candidates run - at the very least it would call into question his own judgement in selecting her as his VP.
I think if Biden team had liked/been more confident in Harris they would have had Biden not running for relection (although not stepping down so Harris could campaign easier) and go ahead with a primary contest with her and a full suite of other candidate. Then let the chips fall where they would hope that any unpleasantness in the primary between candidates would be forgotten by the general.
I think the Biden camps fear in leaving it to the convection would a) be not long enough for the party divisions to be memory holed b) that it wouldn’t just be a Newsom/Harris fight c) they are in denial about how bad the optics are on Biden’s age/behavior.
@Martin Alvito you are right, “nominate” is the wrong language, I should have said “publicly support”. Because he couldn’t visibly support another candidates run - at the very least it would call into question his own judgement in selecting her as his VP.
I think if Biden team had liked/been more confident in Harris they would have had Biden not running for relection (although not stepping down so Harris could campaign easier) and go ahead with a primary contest with her and a full suite of other candidate. Then let the chips fall where they would hope that any unpleasantness in the primary between candidates would be forgotten by the general.
I think the Biden camps fear in leaving it to the convection would a) be not long enough for the party divisions to be memory holed b) that it wouldn’t just be a Newsom/Harris fight c) they are in denial about how bad the optics are on Biden’s age/behavior.
