At least you can say you are part of the 1%!#teamtulsi
RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination
RealClearPolitics - Election 2020 - 2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination
At least you can say you are part of the 1%!#teamtulsi
Gabbard's rather more amenable to authoritarian rule than most Democrats, perhaps owing to her having been raised in a cult.
Her family were part of a religious cult (theologically derived from Hinduism) presided over by a charismatic leader who brooked no resistance.tell us more, sdk
Her family were part of a religious cult (theologically derived from Hinduism) presided over by a charismatic leader who brooked no resistance.
Here's a journalistic take: http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/06/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-campaign.html
Here's a long tweet:
I say she's too amenable to authoritarian rule for most Democrats (and people like me who aren't Democrats but who've voted against Republicans at every opportunity since Reagan started us down the road to our current woeful imbroglio). And I don't have enormous faith in a person's ability to be sufficiently flexible to lead in a very complicated world when they've been raised within rigidly dogmatic structures.Cool. Sounds like a relatively healthy belief system: yoga, no conflict, self-control etc tho' fairly conservative traditionalist views on things like hedonism, abortion and homosexuality. Tulsi confirmed her views on those things have matured and liberalised over the years (much like how a Christian/Catholic's view on such things improve as society improves).
What say you?
I say she's too amenable to authoritarian rule for most Democrats (and people like me who aren't Democrats but who've voted against Republicans at every opportunity since Reagan started us down the road to our current woeful imbroglio). And I don't have enormous faith in a person's ability to be sufficiently flexible to lead in a very complicated world when they've been raised within rigidly dogmatic structures.
Im-bro-lee-oh!what a fine word! i didn't know it, had to google...will have to use it at some point.
Regarding being raised within rigidly dogmatic structures, haven't they all?
Im-bro-lee-oh!
And no, most candidates haven't been raised within rigidly dogmatic structures. Many of them are coming from careers in business and politics, after all, where flexibility is a key component of success.
I don't have enormous faith in a person's ability to be sufficiently flexible to lead in a very complicated world when they've been raised within rigidly dogmatic structures.
...most candidates haven't been raised within rigidly dogmatic structures. Many of them are coming from careers in business and politics, after all, where flexibility is a key component of success.
If Warren gets the nomination I think he has a good chance of being her VP pick - they certainly seem to get on well together.I like Castro, speaks a lot of sense, a bit surprised he's doing so poorly
yup, I'd love that ticked.If Warren gets the nomination I think he has a good chance of being her VP pick - they certainly seem to get on well together.
Probably depends on how sincere you believe her evolution has been.Just to go back to this point: isn't Tulsi evolving her views on the cult's rigidity surrounding abortion, homosexuality etc a sign that she's flexible?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.