Current Affairs 2020 Democratic Primary

Go on then

  • Abrams

  • Biden

  • Bloomberg

  • Booker

  • Brown

  • Castro

  • de Blasio

  • Gabbard

  • Gillibrand

  • Harris

  • Hickenlooper

  • Holder

  • Kerry

  • Klobuchar

  • Moulton

  • O'Rourke

  • Sanders

  • Vegan Cheese on Toasted Artisanal Sourdough (Gluten Free)

  • Warren

  • Winfrey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Gabbard seems like a goo person and has some plus points

CreativeHatefulCavy-size_restricted.gif
 
Maybe because you haven't read much commentary from mainstream liberal media?

Here's a few promo pieces. Tulsi, despite being a more genuine liberal candidate, hasn't had anywhere close to this championing:










You could find similar articles for half a dozen candidates.

The fact that they exist for Kamala Harris doesn’t make her “the progressive media’s darling”.
 
@BirkenheadBlue @steveojcc

what did Tulsi being the most google-searched for candidate after both debates mean to you?
She was and is a non runner and it's quite normal after debates for people to google those who took part.

Are you going to say Mary Ann William's has a great shot now too or she treated unfairly? As she supposedly "won" the second debate according to popular media and social media. Her speech and points where the most googled too off any debate.

Honestly you are either trolling or are being obtuse.

No one cares about Gabbard. She tried and failed to garner significant support that the polls have her way behind.

Not sure how many more ways to say this to you.
 
Honestly you are either trolling or are being obtuse.

No one cares about Gabbard. She tried and failed to garner significant support that the polls have her way behind.

Not sure how many more ways to say this to you.

jesus wept lad, lay off the trolling card.

a lot of folk care about Gabbard, and you saying those pointing this out are trolls is borderline sinister. lest we forget, she still has a chance to get in...


www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/technology/tulsi-gabbard-sues-google.amp.html

 
jesus wept lad, lay off the trolling card.

a lot of folk care about Gabbard, and you saying those pointing this out are trolls is borderline sinister. lest we forget, she still has a chance to get in...


www.nytimes.com/2019/07/25/technology/tulsi-gabbard-sues-google.amp.html

Ok you are not a troll you are instead fixated on trying to be right about gabbard being relevant and maybe there is some sort of conspiracy or something. I don't know really.

Again no one cares about gabbard. As someone who gets to vote for me she is not even going to be on the poll so I am not bothered about her.

Ultimately people pumped funds into her campaign and her people failed so she failed.

She was on every prime time show. Did countless interviews essentially got her fair share of the limelight and failed.

She's a likeable person, she seems to have popularity in politics and if she were in the running people might talk about her more.

But she's not end of.

For the record I called you a troll not people pointing out that they like her and she is popular.
When you repeat yourself.like you have done over and over when people tell you.shes a non starter and not in the running you are either trolling or simply just thick.
 
Marianne Williamson also had a lot of google searches of her name - unless people are happy with what they find out after the search it doesn’t translate into poll numbers, donations or a ground game in Iowa.
I tried explaining this to him above he doesnt seem to get it. He has a hard on for gabbard and I bet he will point to conspiracy next. Given his fox news clip in the non trump thread about that but and his book about Ford. It's clear he is the same old poster.
 
you're calling me thick yet you have this gem in the same post:
Yes I am you really are thick.

Let.me clarify to you as you seem to stupid to realise.

Regular people are a no on Gabbard.

But her peers in politics like her.

So no regular person cares while people in politics like her thus she is popular.

It's pretty fecking simple
 
i like the Washington Examiner article.

it alludes ominously but vaguely to a conspiracy against Gabbard on the part of the DCCC, which apparently opted to neutralise the looming Gabbard threat by choosing in advance to exclude the specific polls it somehow knew would record her months later at marginally over 2%.

it is a good example of why the Washington Examiner is not actually a real newspaper
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top