Current Affairs 2020 Democratic Primary

Go on then

  • Abrams

  • Biden

  • Bloomberg

  • Booker

  • Brown

  • Castro

  • de Blasio

  • Gabbard

  • Gillibrand

  • Harris

  • Hickenlooper

  • Holder

  • Kerry

  • Klobuchar

  • Moulton

  • O'Rourke

  • Sanders

  • Vegan Cheese on Toasted Artisanal Sourdough (Gluten Free)

  • Warren

  • Winfrey


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Warren has had some good poll results recently although how everyone performs in the first debate on June 26/27 is probably what is going to have the most influence on poll numbers.


yup, I could probably google this but do you have any idea how they'll arrange who goes on which night? Is it a random lottery?
 
yup, I could probably google this but do you have any idea how they'll arrange who goes on which night? Is it a random lottery?
Depends what you mean by random ;)

Seems like they are trying to avoid a situation like the Republicans where all the “top tier” went on the first night so are spreading out the candidates over two nights. However an entirely random draw could potentially create that situation. although low probability it would be non-zero, so unclear how they are going to resolve it if the random draw has an uneven clustering. Only thing I am sure of is there will be howls of outrage by some candidates about which night they are selected for!

he DNC is trying to avoid the "kids' table" complaints that were lodged against the Republican National Committee in the run-up to the 2016 election — where front-runners in the large field of candidates were given one forum and lower-tier candidates another.

Each night of the Democratic debates will feature 10 candidates. According to the DNC, the participants for each night will be chosen at random but will be done in a way to ensure that both night's groups feature an even mix of candidates.
 
Interesting poll of the California primary - Harris does poorly for first choice given it is her home state but very well for second choice.
Harris needs strong support in her home state’s primary if she is to have a shot at the party’s presidential nomination. The poll finds her in fourth place, albeit narrowly, trailing former Vice President Joe Biden and Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts and Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
la-1560382375-vbbt7o7gw5-snap-image

(Los Angeles Times)
Harris draws consistent support from across demographic groups and ideological lines and is widely cited as a second choice by voters, but she has no constituency that she dominates, the poll found.

Although Biden leads the race, he’s far from a commanding front-runner in the state that will send the largest group of delegates to next year’s Democratic nominating convention. Biden has support from 22% of likely Democratic primary voters, the poll found. That’s similar to his level in a recent poll of voters in Iowa, which holds the first contest of the primary season, but well below his standing in some national surveys.

Warren and Sanders followed close behind, with 18% and 17% respectively, essentially a tie.
 
Depends what you mean by random ;)

Seems like they are trying to avoid a situation like the Republicans where all the “top tier” went on the first night so are spreading out the candidates over two nights. However an entirely random draw could potentially create that situation. although low probability it would be non-zero, so unclear how they are going to resolve it if the random draw has an uneven clustering. Only thing I am sure of is there will be howls of outrage by some candidates about which night they are selected for!

he DNC is trying to avoid the "kids' table" complaints that were lodged against the Republican National Committee in the run-up to the 2016 election — where front-runners in the large field of candidates were given one forum and lower-tier candidates another.

Each night of the Democratic debates will feature 10 candidates. According to the DNC, the participants for each night will be chosen at random but will be done in a way to ensure that both night's groups feature an even mix of candidates.
more on this
 
so they've divided out the two groups and Warren is on the first night while Biden, Sanders, Harris and Buttigeig are all on the second night. Seems weird.
After we'd discussed how random the random draw would actually be earlier in the thread I tried to work out the math but since it was ages since I'd done stats my head hurt before I completed it!

So I resorted to a more practical experiment. I got a pack of cards, discarded two suits and also the ace/2/3 of the remaining two suits leaving 20 cards to represent the candidates. I then assigned each card to a candidate based on their polling with the higher polling candidates having the higher numbered cards, so the face cards were Biden/Sanders/Warren/Buttigeig/Harris/Beto, and so on down the field with Bill de Blasio/Eric Swalwell getting 4s.

I then shuffled the cards and dealt them into two groups and had a look at what it would have meant for the debates and then repeated the exercise a few times.

Was surprised at quite how often you got either 4 or 5 of the face cards clustered into one debate tbh, was about a third of the time, although never got all 6 in one hand.

Of course probably the weirder things are how much of my Wednesday night I spent doing this and that hubby now feels there is some message that he has to support Warren as he got her card in his hand 5 times in a row lol
 
After we'd discussed how random the random draw would actually be earlier in the thread I tried to work out the math but since it was ages since I'd done stats my head hurt before I completed it!

So I resorted to a more practical experiment. I got a pack of cards, discarded two suits and also the ace/2/3 of the remaining two suits leaving 20 cards to represent the candidates. I then assigned each card to a candidate based on their polling with the higher polling candidates having the higher numbered cards, so the face cards were Biden/Sanders/Warren/Buttigeig/Harris/Beto, and so on down the field with Bill de Blasio/Eric Swalwell getting 4s.

I then shuffled the cards and dealt them into two groups and had a look at what it would have meant for the debates and then repeated the exercise a few times.

Was surprised at quite how often you got either 4 or 5 of the face cards clustered into one debate tbh, was about a third of the time, although never got all 6 in one hand.

Of course probably the weirder things are how much of my Wednesday night I spent doing this and that hubby now feels there is some message that he has to support Warren as he got her card in his hand 5 times in a row lol
haha, this is my favourite post, possibly ever!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top