Current Affairs Ukraine

[davids]

If you want to tell me your real name I will call you that, until then I shall use your username, David.

I wont call you davids, cos there isnt 2 of you.

I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.

 

[Goat]

It isn't, that is just a chant or hashtag that people are encouraged to repeat over and over.

I forget who said it today, but these are war crimes - not terrorism. They have (and others) have done this repeatedly since the end of the Cold War, very few people have been punished, and so here we are.

I am aware bro.

I mean Dresden springs to mind, like.

 

[Goat]

I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours.

I dont really care how people address me on here if im honest.

 

[peteblue]

Why did they invade Iraq?

NATO did not invade Iraq. If NATO wanted to take over any country on the planet they could do so and there is no power that could stop them. If NATO wanted the oil producing Middle East nothing could stop them. If they wanted South America or Africa nothing could stop them. NATO exists to ensure that those countries within it are protected. The only powers on the planet seeking to take over the territories of others are Russia and China. The only threat that NATO has towards both is to deny them to do so……so, once again, why would NATO wish to invade Russia ?…..

 

[bluestevon]

It isn't, that is just a chant or hashtag that people are encouraged to repeat over and over.

I forget who said it today, but these are war crimes - not terrorism. They have (and others) have done this repeatedly since the end of the Cold War, very few people have been punished, and so here we are.

He's been in a wumming campaign for days mate I wouldn't bother (should heed my own advice really on that)

 

[Mutzo Nutzo]

Why did they invade Iraq?

They didn’t. NATO wasn’t involved

 

[Goat]

He's been in a wumming campaign for days mate I wouldn't bother (should heed my own advice really on that)

Wumming?

Neit Comrade.

 

[davids]

NATO did not invade Iraq. If NATO wanted to take over any country on the planet they could do so and there is no power that could stop them. If NATO wanted the oil producing Middle East nothing could stop them. If they wanted South America or Africa nothing could stop them. NATO exists to ensure that those countries within it are protected. The only powers on the planet seeking to take over the territories of others are Russia and China. The only threat that NATO has towards both is to deny them to do so……so, once again, why would NATO wish to invade Russia ?…..

So NATO forces were not involved in the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan? Better tell that to a lot of Brit lads struggling with prosthetic limbs.

 

[davids]

He's been in a wumming campaign for days mate I wouldn't bother (should heed my own advice really on that)

And he's pretty average at it anyway.

 

[peteblue]

So NATO forces were not involved in the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan? Better tell that to a lot of Brit lads struggling with prosthetic limbs.

The USA and U.K. were involved in disarming IRAQ. NATO was not. So once again, why would NATO wish to invade Russia……

 

[bluestevon]

NATO did not invade Iraq. If NATO wanted to take over any country on the planet they could do so and there is no power that could stop them. If NATO wanted the oil producing Middle East nothing could stop them. If they wanted South America or Africa nothing could stop them. NATO exists to ensure that those countries within it are protected. The only powers on the planet seeking to take over the territories of others are Russia and China. The only threat that NATO has towards both is to deny them to do so……so, once again, why would NATO wish to invade Russia ?…..

Serbia says hi. As does Libya and Egypt. First one direct NATO attack on a country without any legal justification the second two NATO actions in all but name.

By China do you mean they're seeking to take over Taiwan when you say the territory of others? Kinda forgetting legally Taiwan is part of China...

 

[davids]

I dont really care how people address me on here if im honest.

So you're not going to share? Ah shame.

 

[Mutzo Nutzo]

So NATO forces were not involved in the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan? Better tell that to a lot of Brit lads struggling with prosthetic limbs.

NATO was not involved in the invasion of Iraq. What part of that TRUE statement do you not understand?

 

[davids]

The USA and U.K. were involved in disarming IRAQ. NATO was not. So once again, why would NATO wish to invade Russia……

Do you mean the phantom WMDs?

 

[McBain]

Whose David? Think you're mistaking me for someone who cares what your problems with global finances are

Oh David.

Its understandable sensible debate and rational thinking elude you, forgive me.