kenada_blue
Welcome to Barcelonaton FC
Agreed. Great points. There are a lot of threads about selling players and no matter how much people point out:
a) We probably won't get to spend 30 million on transfers. We'll probably get 15-20 (if we're lucky).
b) More transfers fail (to various degrees of failure -- Heitinga is better than Koldrup but since we broke our wage structure for Heits, he clearly wants to leave, and isn't guaranteed a starting spot, it can hardly be considered a success) than succeed.
The Lescott deal was forced and he wasn't going to improve so it's a different situation than Rodders but looking at what we got in return for Lescott how are people so excited about the idea of doing that again?
When you take one player and turn him into three it piles on wages which means after that transfer money is gone you're so stretched financially you can't even afford loans (example: us).
As I said in another thread, selling to buy doesn't work. Isn't the fact they have no money and have to sell to buy the reason we want this board gone? So why do we suddenly have all these threads where people suddenly think selling to buy is the answer? It hasn't worked for the last decade ... what's different now? Baffling.
No one wants to see it happen mate. But with our current board and the way the club is ran, we really do need to sell a player for big money to refresh the squad, boost it, and also balance the books.