If this lad's worth 50 mil then transfers have multiplied tenfold in the last decade
A good premier league centre half, that's all. Those saying "this is a signing to make people sit up and take notice" etc have been sniffing MD off Jim White's arse
Economics 101: If income increases, as do prices.When clubs get around 100m+ a season from Sky, of course transfer fees are going to multiply, nobody needs money anymore.
TV Payments alone have tripled for us over the last decade. Add in the Stones money and we can afford that kind of fee.If this lad's worth 50 mil then transfers have multiplied tenfold in the last decade
A good premier league centre half, that's all. Those saying "this is a signing to make people sit up and take notice" etc have been sniffing MD off Jim White's arse
I know yeah, just think this one is proof of that as much as any.When clubs get around 100m+ a season from Sky, of course transfer fees are going to multiply, nobody needs money anymore.
I know yeah, just think this one is proof of that as much as any.
How much you reckon he's worth?
I know yeah, just think this one is proof of that as much as any.
How much you reckon he's worth?
Exactly...let's make him the worlds most expensive defender & make a statement!Worth is such a relative term, he will cost 50m+.
As I was sayingExactly...let's make him the worlds most expensive defender & make a statement!
Exactly...let's make him the worlds most expensive defender & make a statement!
For those who have actually watched them both, who's the better player out of Van Dijk and Manolas. Both slightly unrealistic, but if the money was the same, who is the better player? It's got to be more difficult for an Italian side to turn down 40mil than it would be for Saints given the TV money. Also selling to a rival and all that stuff.
Yes probably. Why?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.