Wasn't dissimilar to
Tarkowski against Newcastle, yet they spend minutes looking at that.
The is the key to the decision last night, the time it took to review. I am sorry but there was easily enough in both instances that meant a certain penalty given, if they had the on field ref check it. That is the suspicion of corruption for me.
There is absolutely no doubt that 9.9 times out of 10 both of those incidents are being asked to be reviewed on the monitor. So, why not last night? Was it corruption or was it just basic ineptness, we may never know but what we do know is that we have been done over again by the officials.