Whilst an initial shedload of cash would obviously be very welcome, overtime it is not sustainable and lets not forget all of the top sides have made significant amounts of money from selling players.
Only Man City, who are backed by a sovereign state no less, and not an individual / organisation, have bucked that trend, whilst Man Utd have loosened the purse strings only recently, with little success.
I'n not saying we couldn't do with another couple of hundred million spent on players, but if Usmanov was to help even with the stadium alone, in either underwriting the so-called private element of the funding, and helping to ensure that capacity came in at 60k plus, then that would be significant.
It is a hugely inflationary market which will eventually pop, and I think the days of Abramovich or his ilk personally underwriting years of transfer spending, are at an end.
It is unglamourous, but we need the stadium, stability, and sustainability. I was very surprised at Keith Harris' comments in the aftermath of the Usmanov 'news' but maybe this is what he meant by help coming in more than one way.