The last Jedi is a perfect example of the benefits of having a George Lucas figure having some consistent control over the narrative trajectory of the entire trilogy... and believe me after the prequels I never thought I’d be praising Lucas. From the original trilogy it’s clear that Lucas has some good ideas, some great ones and some not so good ones and from the prequel trilogy it’s obvious he has some major weaknesses such as writing dialogue for example (“I don’t like sand”... “only a sith deals in absolutes” etc).
However with ESB and ROTJ the filmmaking process, despite having different directors, clearly seemed to be all moving in one direction and this meant that the narrative progress also felt that it was moving in one coherent and consistent direction. ROTJ seems to get a lot of stick now but when you stick it next to TLJ it’s a freaking masterpiece.
I just can’t believe that Disney let Rian Johnson run as wild and free as he did. It genuinely blows my mind that they let him pretty much do what he wanted when let’s face it, his filmography is not that spectacular. Clearly they know they messed up as the trailer for IX already seems to be starting the damage limitation and is attempting to right the wrongs of TLJ. Let’s face it there’s more lightsabers in that trailer alone and the fact Luke’s voice is prominently heard suggests they know how he went out wasn’t good enough for his character. And before people say it’s only “fanboys” who didn’t like TLJ I would tell those people to watch any video of mark hammil’s press work for that film. It’s so obvious he knows the film is garbage or at best tonally wrong and simply all over the place.
I disagree - if anything, 7 and 8 share the same fundamental problems as 1,2 and 3 did; they are all spectacular films where we the audience are encouraged to see things happen. The fall of the Republic, the creation of Vader, the return (and death) of Han Solo and Luke, huge space battles, lightsaber fights etc, all massive visual events that have the effect of ruining the rest of the film because it requires the events to take centre stage rather than the characters and their development. That was why in 2 and 3 there were so many nonsense scenes where a character (usually Padme) had to describe what was going on inbetween the spectacles, and why almost nothing that any of those characters did actually made sense (Anakin's turn to the dark side being infamous here).
To put it another way - perhaps it is interesting that the film that is widely seen as being the best of the lot (ESB) has the least amount of space battles, the equal least amount of lightsaber duels, only one set-piece big battle scene (and that is right at the start of the film), the least amount of wacky planets visited and is the film in which the overall story (in terms of the Rebellion against the Empire) is moved on the least. Half the characters spend two thirds of the film on the same very small ship!
Ironically these flaws were also present in Lucas's hero Kurosawa - whose early films are all character-driven masterpieces (indeed in his best -
Seven Samurai and
Yojimbo - there isn't any wider story) whereas his later films (
Ran being the best example) are visually stunning in terms of the scenes they portray but dull.