Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jesus Christ.
I've just posted the enitre BBC article Kev if you care to read. His predecessor accused VZ of being a Russian symapthiser. That's the article FDB posted...

I also will repeat, I don't think VZ seems like some clean politician who should be worshipped. But yes, right now, he is defending his country against an unjustified invasion
 
Is it possible for you to not be a sociopathic empty toolbox for at least a few posts in a row? No one here would be naive enough to suggest that Zelenski is 100% beyond reproach, but trying to come up with some adolscent "gotchya" moment here regarding Zelensky's government's behavior pre-invasion does not somehow make the Russian invasion any less horrific or legitimate.
7
 
The BBC reported it too
From the article: "Mr Poroshenko told the BBC his election defeat had led to pro-Russian figures returning to key posts in government.

Asked about election posters that were used by his campaign during last year's election, suggesting that a vote for Mr Zelensky was effectively a vote for Russian President Vladimir Putin, Mr Poroshenko said he had been proved right."

Not sure I would be hitching my wagon to this Poroshenko fellow....seems a nutcase who has been proven very wrong very quickly.
 
Not at all, just that I couldn't read that article

Another one then, straight from google :)
Still, it doesn't justify the russian invasion. It does leave the question: all these weapons we send, who will get them & for what will they be used.
 
I've just posted the enitre BBC article Kev if you care to read. His predecessor accused VZ of being a Russian symapthiser. That's the article FDB posted...

I also will repeat, I don't think VZ seems like some clean politician who should be worshipped. But yes, right now, he is defending his country against an unjustified invasion
People like Kev are always about whataboutism and false equivalencies. I understand mostly they are just trying to be funny, or appear to be insightful, but mostly it's just moronic
 

Another one then, straight from google :)
Still, it doesn't justify the russian invasion. It does leave the question: all these weapons we send, who will get them & for what will they be used.
That's absolutely a worry

But the above link proves only that he was accused. Poroshenko also accused Zelinskiy of being a 'Russian fifth columnist' (you posted that link) - which look, is clearly untrue!
 
Yeah, like we've done with RT now then? Because Russia have backed an invasion of Ukraine since 2014? And his entire election campaign - I've read up on it - was about a) trying to improve relations but b) protecting Ukraine from Russia propaganda
 
I think Johnson is useless. However, I also think being rational is important.

People who let their ideology cloud their ability to be rational (like, with respect, Carole Cadwalladr) struggle to see how irrelevant their irrationality makes them.
I don’t disagree, but I’d willingly listen and consider anyone’s point of view if they had a defined ideology.

Johnson only has one. Him.

It’s only important if you believe we as a country should be doing everything in our power to support Ukraine.

I don’t believe we are, but Johnson standing in front of tanks emblazoned with Jingo Jacks will convince many that we are.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top