Current Affairs Ukraine
- Thread starter Mutzo Nutzo
- Start date
- Status
I don't believe they asked you about what makes you happy, and we know you don't make apologies as you have an ego the size of russia
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
I'm sorry. What should I do? Fall into line with the keyboard generals who dont care if their hopes for keeping a war going kills more working class people on each side?
I believe in peace. I believe also that the people of Ukraine and Russia need to overthrow their respective governments.
over throw the red and blue tories in the uk.
over throw putins cabal in russia.
over throw the internal governance of what's left of Ukraine.
What do you do for an encore?
over throw putins cabal in russia.
over throw the internal governance of what's left of Ukraine.
What do you do for an encore?
What's that got to do with the original two Q's the poster asked you, and then my comment on you not answering
You wouldn't ruin as many threads as you do if you just learned to have an actual conversation instead of browbeating everybody with your stance on everything, stating opinion as if fact and ignoring other peoples opinions
Ten fecking years I've been reading your disruptive posting style.
Just have a normal conversation for once for god sake
Eidean
Player Valuation: £8m
Unless it’s Israel.
You didn’t answer my question anyway, what do Ukraine gain from losing the Donbas & do you think Russia stop there long term?
Yarrgh
Player Valuation: £80m
That's just warming up to get us 3 points from a game.
FTFY.
Sorry Dave, but what an awfully glib answer. We all want peace, however at what cost? To the detriment of the Ukrainian people, who've been illegally invaded?
To the detriment of Russia's neighbours in the long-term? Should Britain have rolled over in '40? Russia in '41, all in the name of peace?
While we want peace, the peace was broken by Russia's illegal invasion of Ukraine, and they can not be allowed to benefit from it, or at least to the extent they wish.
Last edited:
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
You can argue it started with a relentless push of NATO to Russias borders.
But boundaries change all the time. Peace, with part of the Donbas going into a buffer zone, makes pragmatic sense now to avoid hundreds of thousand more deaths. And the majority of taken territory have Russian majorities.
Is it right? That's debatable...but the alternative is a never ending war claiming hundreds of thousands more lives.
So why not attack NATO, rather than a non-NATO member? And the intelligence would suggest it would primarily stop Russian grunts from dying.
davek
Player Valuation: £150m
The reason/pretext - whatever you prefer - was that Kyiv was sanctioning a war against Russian speakers in the east of Ukraine.
But the issue now is how to end it.
Spadge Vernacular
Player Valuation: £70m
No you can't. NATO didn't "push" to Russia's borders. Nations which had suffered under Russian rule voluntarily hastened to join NATO for their self defence.
Eidean
Player Valuation: £8m
Wouldn’t bother mate.
We had to teach Dave some history a few pages back, as he wasn’t aware but it won’t change his opinion.
- Status