Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
Ukrainians said this, Ukrainians said that.
I’m waiting for further evidence to support what’s gone on before apportioning blame
Current Affairs Ukraine
- Thread starter Mutzo Nutzo
- Start date
- Status
I’m waiting for further evidence to support what’s gone on before apportioning blame
roydo
in memoriam - 1965-2024
UN confirm it was Russia. Using a missile that only Russia use.
Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
Putin made some important statements this afternoon. Most would be wise to listen carefully:
‘The Ukrainian crisis is not a territorial conflict. Russia is the largest country in the world in terms of territory. We have both Eastern Siberia and the Far East to deal with. It's not a territorial conflict. And not even about establishing a regional geopolitical balance. The question is much broader and more fundamental: we are talking about the principles on which the new world order will be based.’
- ‘The United States does not just set rules arbitrarily. But they also demand at the same time - by whom and how they should be fulfiled This is a manifestation of colonial thinking. We hear all the time: you have to, you have to, we warn you seriously. Who are you anyway? What right do you have to warn someone?’
- Let me remind you that in the Russian military doctrine there are two reasons for the possible use of nuclear weapons. The first is a counter blow, we respond to aggression. I want to assure you: the answer is absolutely unacceptable for any potential aggressor. In a retaliatory strike, so many hundreds of our missiles will appear in the air that no enemy will have a chance of survival. The second reason: the threat of the existence of the Russian state, even if conventional weapons are used against us.
- ‘ since June 4, Ukrainian units have lost more than 90 thousand people. These are irretrievable losses. 550 tanks.’
‘The Ukrainian crisis is not a territorial conflict. Russia is the largest country in the world in terms of territory. We have both Eastern Siberia and the Far East to deal with. It's not a territorial conflict. And not even about establishing a regional geopolitical balance. The question is much broader and more fundamental: we are talking about the principles on which the new world order will be based.’
- ‘The United States does not just set rules arbitrarily. But they also demand at the same time - by whom and how they should be fulfiled This is a manifestation of colonial thinking. We hear all the time: you have to, you have to, we warn you seriously. Who are you anyway? What right do you have to warn someone?’
- Let me remind you that in the Russian military doctrine there are two reasons for the possible use of nuclear weapons. The first is a counter blow, we respond to aggression. I want to assure you: the answer is absolutely unacceptable for any potential aggressor. In a retaliatory strike, so many hundreds of our missiles will appear in the air that no enemy will have a chance of survival. The second reason: the threat of the existence of the Russian state, even if conventional weapons are used against us.
- ‘ since June 4, Ukrainian units have lost more than 90 thousand people. These are irretrievable losses. 550 tanks.’
Last edited:
In other words, waiting for Putin to deny it and ignoring all the evidence that implicates him. You're an absolute bellend Kev
Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
Nope. Let’s wait for the dust to settle. We’ve seen false flags before now. If the Russians did it then it’s an awful thing to have happened.
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
Fixed that for you.
Russia also blew up a hospital today in Beryslav. Just the 2 war crimes so far today.
Putin knows all about false flags, as I’am sure you are aware.
Just call it out mate.
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
I'll give it a go.. putin said that Russia has not killed 1 civilian or blown up any civilian infrastructure any infrastructure destroyed was done by Kiev, Russia have killed 300 thousand Ukrainian soldiers and only losing 6000 Russian troops.
I think we can trust a president. Except Zelenski.
Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
There'll be no nukes launched.. Even putin isn't that stupid.. he knows Russia will be whiped out in response.. That's the only threat he's got left.. he had 2 threats and he used the Energy threat last year and it failed.. he's also got to have seen the corruption in his military and the nuke sector has likley seen the same mismanagement..
To arrive before winter
Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
If the threats were empty then the so called impregnable nato would have waltzed into Ukraine and ejected Putins convict army before now.
Right ?
- Status