No that's your default position for any poster who doesn't tow the party line.
If you're happy to believe everything that the Western media pumps out good for you. Seeing the flaws in the US driven narrative doesn't make anyone guilty of supporting Russian atrocities.
*Toe. Not tow. As in "to stand with one's toes on the line".
It's Russian state-affiliated media. The need for the label to even exist is because so much pro-Putin propoganda is deceitfully presented online as being unbiased. It is not "believing everything the western media pumps out" to note that Russian state-affiliated media, openly labelled as such, is affiliated to and by extension promoting the same vested interests as the Russian state. To argue otherwise is very much to indicate that you don't understand the ramifications of a media outlet being state-affiliated.
Equally, it is foolish to blindly believe everything hing produced by UKR-affiliated state media without verification from other sources with fewer vested interests. Or USA media - USA is shorthand for America, BTW (by the way).
Have you finished untying your own knots about whether you do or don't think UKR government was right or wrong to reject a ceasefire proposal that demanded they cede Crimea, Donbass and all other seized territories? You went very quiet on that yesterday - understandable given the excitement in the fridges thread and the news that tourism to Crimea is booming.
