Don't know all his views I've got to be honest.
Naysayers will disagree but i think the pressure he put on the police helped to accelerate and in some cases initiate investigations into the racist paedophile gangs.
It's forgotten now or maybe people just try to rewrite history. But the sentiment that obtained at the time was that the accusations were racist and shouldn't be looked in to. Not by kooky fringe on the extreme left that was a mainstream belief.
A channel 4 documrntsry was cancelled for that exact reason.
So theres that.
Islam is deeply flawed with violence at its core. It literally has no place in modern society and is the biggest barrier to world peace.
The misogyny and homophobia that runs through the book is known by most and scarcely needs to be mentioned.
This is given a pass by many on the left for some unfathomable reason. Imagine UKIP got in and they made homosexuality a capital offence. And said women had to wear face masks and could be beaten by Their husbands.
It would be weird.
There is still hate preaching in mainstream mosques and he does his best to expose that. But like with the rape gangs hes called racist.
When the actual racists are allowed to preach their hate without censure.
Im basically opposed to the far right extremism that Islam preaches. If islam was a 'white' religion it would be an uncontroversial stance.
Have you read the Quran? I suggest not.
Do you know its teachings?
Or are you just regurgitating what the media (those generally against Muslims) teaches and shows you.
Do you know any Muslims or have you talked to any of them about their teachings and understanding of their own faith.
If you had you would realise that the majority if Muslims do not believe in violence. Their teachings based on their book the Quran teaches violence only in self defense because when it was written they were at siege.
Many Muslims do not practice this nor do they read too much into it.
Terrorism is obviously bad and there are those of the Islamic faith who take things to the extreme but is that any different to Christians in the past?
Every religion has its flaw and its extreme views. The more modern aggression from religious group just happen to be the extremists who use their religion to justify their means nothing new there. I am not justifying what they do or who they are but you cannot tar an entire group based on a minority of people or simply because some of them follow their faith way too seriously. Again no different to some of the Christians groups that are around today especially here in the US. Or if you want some Catholics and their views.
Christians were at one point also abusive to their women and very primitive with their views on certain things. Some Christians still are primitive in their beliefs.