Current Affairs The WOKE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its ok, the old gammons will all die soon.

My Grandson is learning about Rosa Parks in school at the moment, the next generation wont be full of as much ham.
I'm mostly inspired by the generation coming through, I remember the gammerati on here calling them 'little darlings' for getting up and protesting the climate crisis. They understand new age media and the interpretation of the written word in a way that right wing think tanks aren't smart enough to preemptively combat.

I just hope its not too late.
 
Imagine the day the final Boomer dies, the world will become a utopia.
Though I am far from on their side, it has to be noted that a generation spoiled for as long as it was was always going to rebel against giving up their precious entitlements. Imagine the shock when you first hear the word 'no' in your late 60's or 70's.
 
Though I am far from on their side, it has to be noted that a generation spoiled for as long as it was was always going to rebel against giving up their precious entitlements. Imagine the shock when you first hear the word 'no' in your late 60's or 70's.
Reminds me of an anecdote Stephen Fry told about the time he met screenwriter William Goldman. Fry gushingly asks Goldman, 'gosh, what's Robert Redford really like?'. 'Tell me , young man', replied Goldman, 'how do you think you would turn out if you hadn't heard the word no in all your adult life?'
 
Its ok, the old gammons will all die soon.

My Grandson is learning about Rosa Parks in school at the moment, the next generation wont be full of as much ham.
Sadly I found education doesn't work like that. What kids learn and what they take in board as part of their life values are not necessarily the same.

To illustrate I recall a lesson I gave to an A level chemistry class directly relating car use to various forms of pollution , CO2 production, climate change, atmospheric acidification etc and pleaded with them to consider how necessary a car journey is and what alternatives there are. I was later told by a grass, that straight after the lesson one lad got straight in his car and drove 500 yards up the road for a packets of fags.

There's a world of difference between what a person learns and their self discipline or selfishness.
 
Sadly I found education doesn't work like that. What kids learn and what they take in board as part of their life values are not necessarily the same.

To illustrate I recall a lesson I gave to an A level chemistry class directly relating car use to various forms of pollution , CO2 production, climate change, atmospheric acidification etc and pleaded with them to consider how necessary a car journey is and what alternatives there are. I was later told by a grass, that straight after the lesson one lad got straight in his car and drove 500 yards up the road for a packets of fags.

There's a world of difference between what a person learns and their self discipline or selfishness.
I remember them classes in school, they told us we would have ran out of fossil fuel by now and that we were heading into an ice age.

Turns out now we are going to boil to death, so what is it freeze to death or boil to death? Or they’re chatting utter crap?

Bringing in Dr Lorenz / Chaos Theory / limitations of climate modelling and the impact of cloud formation on climate modelling, that is a good starting point for discussion.

The “gobsmackingly bananas” climate sensationalism in the Comradian yesterday included the below graph. Why is it wrong to use linear regression to model a non linear process? Using the below linear claimed increase of 0.22 degrees per decade how long until a 5 degree increase in average temperature? Also calculate for 100.

Woke science gobsmackingly stupid:

1696583876567.webp
 
I remember them classes in school, they told us we would have ran out of fossil fuel by now and that we were heading into an ice age.

Turns out now we are going to boil to death, so what is it freeze to death or boil to death? Or they’re chatting utter crap?

Bringing in Dr Lorenz / Chaos Theory / limitations of climate modelling and the impact of cloud formation on climate modelling, that is a good starting point for discussion.

The “gobsmackingly bananas” climate sensationalism in the Comradian yesterday included the below graph. Why is it wrong to use linear regression to model a non linear process? Using the below linear claimed increase of 0.22 degrees per decade how long until a 5 degree increase in average temperature? Also calculate for 100.

Woke science gobsmackingly stupid:

View attachment 230276
Saying “Climate change isn’t real” after two years of unprecedented natural disasters and temperature changes is remarkably stupid, even by your low standards.
 
Saying “Climate change isn’t real” after two years of unprecedented natural disasters and temperature changes is remarkably stupid, even by your low standards.
Climate is always changing, been natural disasters since time began.

Using linear regression to model climate and make claims using that is one of the funniest things I’ve ever seen.
 
Which part of 1984 are you referring to Johnny? I've read the book multiple times.

Unless of course you're lying again and you haven't read 1984. Or indeed any book that didn't have chewable pages.

The bit where 2+2 =5, I did provide a link maybe you missed it?

Everyone knows a male is not female. Except via woke indoctrination. I don’t identify as a male, I just am a male huge difference.

The argument biological sex does not exist is beyond contempt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top