Current Affairs The WOKE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lozza sacked by the bloody wokies over at... checks notes... GB News. Country's gone to the shitter.
Ah, Lozza.

Of course, it'll be the wider plot to get him for speaking truth to power / exercising his Democratic right to free speech / abusing his democratic right to free speech and being a right bell end for personal gain whilst taking no responsibility for his actions and words.

Which is the problem with many of his ilk, they are incredibly privileged in being able to say what they like but exercise very little thought or care in what they say. Then complain when people exercise their right to point out they are talking horsepoop. The loudest 'silenced' people the world has ever known.
 
Ah, Lozza.

Of course, it'll be the wider plot to get him for speaking truth to power / exercising his Democratic right to free speech / abusing his democratic right to free speech and being a right bell end for personal gain whilst taking no responsibility for his actions and words.

Which is the problem with many of his ilk, they are incredibly privileged in being able to say what they like but exercise very little thought or care in what they say. Then complain when people exercise their right to point out they are talking horsepoop. The loudest 'silenced' people the world has ever known.
Can't say anything these days
 
Mate, the amount of instances of this compared to the ridiculous over reaction from you and the other million gammons is effin laughable.

Why aren’t you constantly moaning about catholic priests or met police officers? Yiu have totally fallen for this fake news about trans people ruining the world.

If I’m honest, I’ve never met a bright gammon and you’ve confirmed this in spades.

Go for a walk and consider why you waste so much anger, energy and emotion on such an insignificant thing
Presumably women that have transitioned to become men use male toilets? Wonder why he doesn’t bring that into the argument? 🤔 I mean, I could take a guess, and that guess would be informed by his earlier ‘concerns’ expressed about men ejaculating into other men, but that would then point to a strong element of, I don’t know, shall we say… homophobia?! 🤔 Nah, can’t be that - this is a strong male role model after all, secure in himself and his place in the world. Why, when he’s not ‘doing sets’ in the gym, he’s out on the town, enjoying steak and Peroni, lest we forget, WITH! A! WOMAN! A real woman, mind, not one of those chest feeders or people who bleed…


GOOD DAY!!! 🙄
 
I think you are going way too far with this. The crux was that you are angry with the question 'Are you Pregnant' and how much time and money this costs but if this is what we are talking about then that is the most efficient way of determining if you are pregnant.

I will answer each point though.



I don't understand people who want to be animals, when you see pictures of tattoos and reconstruction surgery. I remember seeing people who had their tongue split to look like a lizard, etc. I do not understand and will never understand it. However, they may be nice people, so I will refrain from full judgement on who they are as people.



I have no idea what that last part means, sorry. What middle age health check? Are you wanting this or not wanting this, it is not clear. In regards to the first part, nobody is jumping through hoops. It is just a simple change of the language we use, it has happened a hundred times over, do we still talk like we are in Elizabethan times, like we are characters in Romeo & Juliet, no we don't. Terminology updates, language changes as humanity evolves.



I have put a bit of weight on, so yes I do have boobs. Joking aside, not sure that is one of the questions on a medical exam, or ever will be to be honest. it is not an argument to say that something that has not happened is a reason to get angry. I am not going to get angry and say 'I can't believe that they could potentially ask if I have ever seen a man eat his own head, it is just beyond ridiculous'



See above.



See the first point, this is where I think the original rant falls down. Either you ask one simple question and get angry or they ask multiple questions and get angry as you have also stated that it is wasting time an money asking if you are pregnant. Which one do you want?



It will only do harm if people allow it to do harm. If they change the language on a medical form to be more inclusive then that hurts nobody, literally no harm is done. If somebody shouts, complains, rants, protests publicly, about that change, then that has the potential to harm.
Time it takes to answer the pregnancy question - a nanosecond.

Time it takes to post (and read) all of his BS - there aren’t enough hours in the day. 😔
 
Presumably women that have transitioned to become men use male toilets? Wonder why he doesn’t bring that into the argument? 🤔 I mean, I could take a guess, and that guess would be informed by his earlier ‘concerns’ expressed about men ejaculating into other men, but that would then point to a strong element of, I don’t know, shall we say… homophobia?! 🤔 Nah, can’t be that - this is a strong male role model after all, secure in himself and his place in the world. Why, when he’s not ‘doing sets’ in the gym, he’s out on the town, enjoying steak and Peroni, lest we forget, WITH! A! WOMAN! A real woman, mind, not one of those chest feeders or people who bleed…


GOOD DAY!!! 🙄
It’s like I start calling my bedroom a living room then speaking to a professional about work on it then them asking questions, is it where someone sleeps? Does it have pillows? Is the bedroom you absolute idiot. The deeper philosophical implications behind stuff like this is beyond your wokey comprehension.


It is impossible to transition from a male to female in terms of sex. It’s basically trying to shoe horn the definition of woman to mean sex and gender and nobody is buying it expect a few woke lunatics.

If I go for a middle aged health check up, let’s say there is 20 questions, with questions exclusive 10 to males, 10 exclusive to females, based on the difference between males and females.

Are you going to ask all 20 question to both and frame them in bizarre woke speak? 🤣 let me guess yes because “not science”

If that makes me a feminist TERF then so be it. Protecting woman spaces is important.

Good day! 💁🏻‍♂️
 
It’s like I start calling my bedroom a living room then speaking to a professional about work on it then them asking questions, is it where someone sleeps? Does it have pillows? Is the bedroom you absolute idiot. The deeper philosophical implications behind stuff like this is beyond your wokey comprehension.


It is impossible to transition from a male to female in terms of sex. It’s basically trying to shoe horn the definition of woman to mean sex and gender and nobody is buying it expect a few woke lunatics.

If I go for a middle aged health check up, let’s say there is 20 questions, with questions exclusive 10 to males, 10 exclusive to females, based on the difference between males and females.

Are you going to ask all 20 question to both and frame them in bizarre woke speak? 🤣 let me guess yes because “not science”

If that makes me a feminist TERF then so be it. Protecting woman spaces is important.

Good day! 💁🏻‍♂️
How widespread of a problem do you think this really is?
I've read a few of your posts and you seem to be taking extreme and very rare examples (along with a fair smattering of made up ones) and presenting them as if they are common occurences.

Yes, there are some outlying issues that haven't been fully resolved as a society, but over 99% of it is just people asking for their life choices to be respected. Why not focus on that?
 
How widespread of a problem do you think this really is?
I've read a few of your posts and you seem to be taking extreme and very rare examples (along with a fair smattering of made up ones) and presenting them as if they are common occurences.

Yes, there are some outlying issues that haven't been fully resolved as a society, but over 99% of it is just people asking for their life choices to be respected. Why not focus on that?


No problem with people identifying as whatever they want, the issue is when you start saying they’re something they’re not and it starts affecting woman spaces, woman sports. Consultation in hospitals. This stuff also causes issues for other groups. So your moral high ground is shaky at best.

It’s like building doors that are 3 foot tall for little people then making everyone walk under them. And asking why not?

Also where all of your arguments fall down is this.

The below are biological properties that are irrefutable.

XY = male
XX = female

XX = XX TRUE
XY= XY TRUE
XX = XY FALSE <— that’s your issue.

You lot literally are straight out of 1984:

2+2 =5

Good day!
 
No problem with people identifying as whatever they want, the issue is when you start saying they’re something they’re not and it starts affecting woman spaces, woman sports. Consultation in hospitals. This stuff also causes issues for other groups. So your moral high ground is shaky at best.

It’s like building doors that are 3 foot tall for little people then making everyone walk under them. And asking why not?

Also where all of your arguments fall down is this.

The below are biological properties that are irrefutable.

XY = male
XX = female

XX = XX TRUE
XY= XY TRUE
XX = XY FALSE <— that’s your issue.

You lot literally are straight out of 1984:

2+2 =5

Good day!
Or, like making doors wide enough for people in wheelchairs. Everyone can then get through them without problems, but then bellends like you cry about it and say it's not fair.

You've already been booted off this forum for being an odious little tit. Why are you back on here?
 
No problem with people identifying as whatever they want, the issue is when you start saying they’re something they’re not and it starts affecting woman spaces, woman sports. Consultation in hospitals. This stuff also causes issues for other groups. So your moral high ground is shaky at best.

It’s like building doors that are 3 foot tall for little people then making everyone walk under them. And asking why not?

Also where all of your arguments fall down is this.

The below are biological properties that are irrefutable.

XY = male
XX = female


XX = XX TRUE
XY= XY TRUE
XX = XY FALSE <— that’s your issue.

You lot literally are straight out of 1984:

2+2 =5

Good day!

Does this not refute that? There are usually exceptions to general principles. The Transgender topic is specifically about exceptions.



 
No problem with people identifying as whatever they want, the issue is when you start saying they’re something they’re not and it starts affecting woman spaces, woman sports. Consultation in hospitals. This stuff also causes issues for other groups. So your moral high ground is shaky at best.

It’s like building doors that are 3 foot tall for little people then making everyone walk under them. And asking why not?

Also where all of your arguments fall down is this.

The below are biological properties that are irrefutable.

XY = male
XX = female

XX = XX TRUE
XY= XY TRUE
XX = XY FALSE <— that’s your issue.

You lot literally are straight out of 1984:

2+2 =5

Good day!
This is where your argument falls down though.

We are not building doors 3 feet high.
What happens in a consultation room is private between dr and patient and affects not one other single person.
There are very very few instances of womens sports being won by men that have transitioned.

As I said, you are taking extreme (and made up examples), and presenting them as everyday occurences.
 
No problem with people identifying as whatever they want, the issue is when you start saying they’re something they’re not and it starts affecting woman spaces, woman sports. Consultation in hospitals. This stuff also causes issues for other groups. So your moral high ground is shaky at best.

It’s like building doors that are 3 foot tall for little people then making everyone walk under them. And asking why not?

Also where all of your arguments fall down is this.

The below are biological properties that are irrefutable.

XY = male
XX = female

XX = XX TRUE
XY= XY TRUE
XX = XY FALSE <— that’s your issue.

You lot literally are straight out of 1984:

2+2 =5

Good day!

Then you should be OK with a medical professional just 100% making sure that they are not going to give you something that will harm you. The terminology they use should not be an issue, it really shouldn't.

I was leaving the next point, as my grammar is not always the best for gods sake, when you are talking about the plural for female humans it is WOMEN, not WOMAN. In the context of sports and spaces the more correct term would probably be female as it flows better that women. I am getting so angry at you not using the word that I prefer to be used, see how stupid that sounds ;)

You are right sex is generally an irrefutable fact, although there are rare cases where it cannot be scientifically determined. However, gender is subjective and this is what you have to understand. People think differently to you, people have different feelings to you, why can't you accept that.

In rare cases, there will be times when a persons personal belief/emotional feelings, towards their own gender identity, will affect another persons, but 99.9999999% of the time it affects nothing and nobody.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top