I wasnt clear to me, which is why I asked the question.Read what I posted again. I did not say that, nor did I suggest that.
First of all, gather information.
If a criminal offence committed, then it proceeds to PACE 84. She would not have been handed the job of doing the investigation without the proper training. At my lowly grade, HEO, we were still, after training, empowered to conduct interviews under caution (either taped or written) under PACE 84. I am in no position to know whether she has conducted any interviews under PACE, or not.
On occasions, after Investigators submitted the report to senior officers, the senior officers would contact the Police if the misdemeanor was of sufficient gravity, and the Police would conduct the interview under caution under PACE.
Apologies if my previous post wasn't clear.
I reckon, as she's not a serving police officer not acting in the course of police activities, she's not interviewing people under PACE.
It would become a police matter if there were criminal activity though, as you rightly say..
