ForeverBlue92
Player Valuation: £80m
did you read what I wrote mate ? No offence but this is like a @Joey66 reply or a politician where he doesn’t bother to read the reply and sticks to the argument that they want to have .
To be clear like all murders the sentence is life with a minimum of 11 years which I get your angry at I presume half as angry as you were 10 minutes ago when you said it was 5.5 years . The sentence is a minimum Not the sentence so could it have been more , of course but it doesn’t mean he’ll be out in 11 years .
As regards the judge he’s sentenced the lad to life , I presume also taken into account the guidelines he has to follow for the minimum including the age . I’m not sure what the judge has done wrong to be honest , it could of course been a higher minimum but What would you be Have been happy with ? So if he’d said 15 years is a life worth that , how about 20 ?
It seems to be a horrible brutal murder and he’s rightly in nick for murder , where he’ll still be in 2030 and very probably long after that . Sentencing can be a mess but the judge has given him life the lad will always been on life licence if he’s ever released , in this country we simply don’t jail everyone for ‘life means life ‘ when they’re convicted of murder . We don’t and haven’t done for a very long time if ever if you want that to change campaign for it or lobby but it’s not the judges fault or kier starmers.
(Sorry for @ you joey but I know you get angry if you’re mentioned and nobody does it just felt appropriate . Mostly we argued loads about this very thing back in the day in the EU thread )
But thats what needs to change mate - the guidelines are a farce when it comes to serious crimes.
Im all for life means life but even if that never happens / changes then atleast make murder a minimum 25-30 years -whereas the average imprisonment seems to be around 15 years or so based on national statistics.
