peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
Come on lads, you're going to need to smear more.
So in just 6 months Labour have gone from a 7 point lead to a 4 point lead, bravo, bravo........
Come on lads, you're going to need to smear more.
The Labour Party need to work until they are musclebound !
So in just 6 months Labour have gone from a 7 point lead to a 4 point lead, bravo, bravo........
don't know were they would get the money from, maybe start at looking why the costs are so high when compared to the rest of the world, the cost to administrate it,or ask the Scottish government how they manage it.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-45421621
I see today that the current student loan 'bill' is around £118bn, which presumably if university was made free for all, this would be a direct expense on the tax payer? Given that it's Labour policy to offer free university education, where would that kind of money be found? I get that this total sum will be spread over many years, but even if you spread it over the entire 20 years of tuition fees being in place (which is obviously unrealistic as many of them will have been repaid), that's still £9bn a year.
don't know were they would get the money from, maybe start at looking why the costs are so high when compared to the rest of the world, the cost to administrate it,or ask the Scottish government how they manage it.
Doesn't matter anyway , as the current likely hood of Labour ever getting power are pretty slim, if they couldn't beat May last time, with her dementia tax own goal, a appetite in the country looking for change at the time, the total collapse of the Liberal vote, and Corbyn riding a wave of optimism as the new face on the block .
Only chance they have is if the Tories go into an election with May as leader, after she cocks up brexit, and I think that is highly unlikely.
Stop scaremongering, this is typical MSM destroying Corbyns policies.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-45421621
I see today that the current student loan 'bill' is around £118bn, which presumably if university was made free for all, this would be a direct expense on the tax payer? Given that it's Labour policy to offer free university education, where would that kind of money be found? I get that this total sum will be spread over many years, but even if you spread it over the entire 20 years of tuition fees being in place (which is obviously unrealistic as many of them will have been repaid), that's still £9bn a year.

"The Corbyn surge has brought in troglodytes who have dwelt in dark basements for the past few decades, consumed by righteous hatred not just of Tories but also of Blairites and other traitors. "
https://www.economist.com/britain/2018/09/08/britains-equilibrium-of-incompetence
I must say, that made me chuckle this morning lol
What a strange article for the Economist. It states that the LP is going into decline and yet produces no facts to back that assertion up. It's almopst like they're not using facts because the assertion is untrue and the reverse is the case.All these years you've been hiding your flair for comic timing under a bushel Dave.
What a strange article for the Economist. It states that the LP is going into decline and yet produces no facts to back that assertion up. It's almopst like they're not using facts because the assertion is untrue and the reverse is the case.
You're basing your assertion that Labour are going great guns on things that only really matter to the Labour party (membership numbers etc.). The Economist article is basing their assertion on their competence in opposition. You're pleased that you're 2nd in a 2 horse race, I get that, but it's not really much of an accomplishment. I also get that you're more interested in Labour being in power than being an effective opposition. You're as much a Labour tribalist as you are an Everton tribalist, but most people aren't of the same mindset.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.