Current Affairs The Labour Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've not fallen for anything mate we all know the media overstate these things which is why Labour are naive/stupid to keep fighting the Tories on these issues as they can't win against the populist opinion!

Even if its better to be in the EU than not you aint going to win an election saying that! Labour have to be streetwise and pick their battles and look at where the Tories are at their weakest - the economy.

The average white van man can't relate to being nicked at a Sarah Everard Vigil or being victim of police brutality in the USA but he is affected by rising energy bills, by daft houses prices, zero hour contracts and Universal Credit so pick your battles!
It's not a case of the media overstating these things, it's people believing these things. You seem to be saying that it's perfectly right and proper that people have a distorted view of the world, and indeed you seem happy that you yourself do. Not only that, you're happy for our government to continue spreading those lies rather than use facts and evidence to underpin what they do. If, as you suggest, that philosophy is in the majority then we really are in a sorry state.
 
Imagine thinking this bloke cares about the working class

And don't forget these gems :


 
I've not fallen for anything mate we all know the media overstate these things which is why Labour are naive/stupid to keep fighting the Tories on these issues as they can't win against the populist opinion!

Even if its better to be in the EU than not you aint going to win an election saying that! Labour have to be streetwise and pick their battles and look at where the Tories are at their weakest - the economy.

The average white van man can't relate to being nicked at a Sarah Everard Vigil or being victim of police brutality in the USA but he is affected by rising energy bills, by daft houses prices, zero hour contracts and Universal Credit so pick your battles!
Sometimes you have to support what is right, I suspect the same things were being said when Labour MPs were supporting gay rights and speaking out against South African apartheid in the 1980s
 
;)Do try and get a copy of this book.

Well worth a read, and highlights an alternative Labour manifesto.

Part of the Blue Labour group.

Pro- Brexit.
Pro Nation State.
Patriotic ( without being nationalistic)
Pro- renationalising all major utilities.
A shift in emphasis from identity politics towards reconnecting with the traditional Red Wall voters.
Sounds good to me;)
 
It's not a case of the media overstating these things, it's people believing these things. You seem to be saying that it's perfectly right and proper that people have a distorted view of the world, and indeed you seem happy that you yourself do. Not only that, you're happy for our government to continue spreading those lies rather than use facts and evidence to underpin what they do. If, as you suggest, that philosophy is in the majority then we really are in a sorry state.
I don't think you're understanding what he's saying at all.

To put it the way James Carville did, "It's the economy, stupid." In other words, you don't win elections by converting people to your worldview. That process happens, or doesn't, independent of the electoral process. You win elections by making common cause with people that disagree with your worldview. If you're going to sit there and denigrate him for believing what he believes, don't expect him to vote for your preferred political candidates. If you want to engage him in terms he understands, you have a much better shot at earning his vote.

Sometimes you have to support what is right, I suspect the same things were being said when Labour MPs were supporting gay rights and speaking out against South African apartheid in the 1980s
A real cynic would say that those Labour MPs said what they said about those issues because they knew that was what their constituencies wanted to hear, and that they were prioritizing their own re-election over producing tangible real-world results with respect to those issues. A really committed cynic would say that the worst thing that can happen to the fire-eaters on any given issue is the resolution of that issue, because the resolution of that issue unravels the whole rationale for electing them in the first place. In marketing terms, it destroys their brand.
 
I don't think you're understanding what he's saying at all.

To put it the way James Carville did, "It's the economy, stupid." In other words, you don't win elections by converting people to your worldview. That process happens, or doesn't, independent of the electoral process. You win elections by making common cause with people that disagree with your worldview. If you're going to sit there and denigrate him for believing what he believes, don't expect him to vote for your preferred political candidates. If you want to engage him in terms he understands, you have a much better shot at earning his vote.
He has his view and is perfectly entitled to that view, I'm merely saying that it has been proven many times that when it comes to the factors underpinning the things he talks about, people have a very skewed perception of reality. For instance, given the terrible events yesterday, there are quite probably going to be various discussions around Islam (again). Now, given the below, should we discuss the topic based upon what actually is or what people "think" is?


If you want to discuss the issue on what actually is rather than people's perceptions, then you have to go about correcting incorrect perceptions, do you not? Or are we happy to pander to ignorance simply because that's what people believe? Heaven knows, it's quite evident that the Tories are quite happy to deal in lies and fantasies, but that hardly seems something we should reward when it comes to choosing a government.
 
ou don't win elections by converting people to your worldview. That process happens, or doesn't, independent of the electoral process. You win elections by making common cause with people that disagree with your worldview. If you're going to sit there and denigrate him for believing what he believes, don't expect him to vote for your preferred political candidates. If you want to engage him in terms he understands, you have a much better shot at earning his vote.

Absolutely.

Crudely put in U K terms, that part of the left which feels free to proclaim loudly that a significant part of the electorate is thick and racist and five minutes later begs for their vote, pave the road for election failure.
 
Absolutely.

Crudely put in U K terms, that part of the left which feels free to proclaim loudly that a significant part of the electorate is thick and racist and five minutes later begs for their vote, pave the road for election failure.

Around 1 in 5 Brits believe other races are inherently less intelligent, and up to 44% believe other races to be less hard working. Are you suggesting that such attitudes should be blithely accepted?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top