Current Affairs The General Election

Voting Intentions

  • Labour

    Votes: 209 61.1%
  • Tories

    Votes: 30 8.8%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 20 5.8%
  • Brexit Gubbins

    Votes: 8 2.3%
  • Greens

    Votes: 8 2.3%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Change UK, if that's their current moniker

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • SNP

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • DUP

    Votes: 3 0.9%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 9 2.6%
  • Alliance

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • SDLP

    Votes: 2 0.6%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • Some fringe party with a catchy name

    Votes: 7 2.0%
  • A plague on all your houses

    Votes: 32 9.4%

  • Total voters
    342
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
No idea on the others involved but that manifesto (ive just seen snippets) is really quite comical.

For Abbot, surely its not racism/sexism why shes being publicised in videos making enormous errors over and over again? Surely its because shes not very good at her job? Didnt know she was a solicitor, mind blown...worried if she was mine and she cant remember numbers or make a rational argument (based on the videos).

Disagree about the corporate side...in Singapore they run the country as a business. If UK goes out of the EU then Singapore should be copied...tax advantages for IT firms and progressive firms now were in the 4th industrial revolution.

Just cant understand why anyone would want services to be state owned...it makes no sense to me?

Whats your view?



That was your take away from the video?

Not that the labour guy was that as hes making over £80k hes on 45% tax. In fact if you make £125k+ 50% goes in tax.

All of these state owned dreams of Corbyn rely on taxing the top 5%.

What happens if alot of the top 5% relocate to Italy, Spain or Portugal (all offering tax free or low tax for expats)...

3 things happen

1: The money isnt there for Corbyn so he has to increase tax for others below

2: The economy shrinks because assets (people) leave the country bringing and spending their money overseas.

3: £80k 50% tax ? Who would want to move there...so you also lose overseas workers at the top level.


Its totally daft.



I think they should have a landslide victory.

Re Abbot I sense there's both things at play really. She's not very good at remembering figures (which is essentially a key component of modern interview techniques) but it's always curious to me the double standards at play. Johnson has made all sorts of blunders but it gets frames differently, in a joking manner. I wouldn't have her doing media interviews, but in fairness she has had a successful career outside of politics (far more so than Mcdonnell or Corbyn).

In relation to Singapore, I suppose there are enormous cultural difference and the population size of what, 5 million makes a big difference too. The UK will always have to be a bit more diverse. The Chinese work ethic is quite different too and they have had a very different system to ours over the last 50-60 years.

I am not against innovation though. A big problem in this country is that the liberalisation from what I can see just leads to cronyism. We need to be far more entrepreneurial, but that gets translated in this country and cushy deals for people you went to school with, as opposed to genuinely dynamic changes in key areas (particularly in terms of Green technologies).

In terms of the state V private ownership and why you'd want either. It's difficult to say. I am not necessarily a massive fan of state ownership, but the privatisation model has been pretty horrendous here. Southern Rail are just appalling, yet year after year they get contracts renewed and there seems no democratic comeback that could surely happen with government control (IE you can at least change the government). Thats one advantage for me anyway, with government control comes a degree of accountability and control to the mass of people, rather than to the narrow interests of their shareholders (though they could clash).

What you want to see, I would say is the two sectors working together. I've worked in both sectors and see advantages to each. Certainly from the Conservatives I've never really felt they get that balance between how the two can help one another particularly adeptly. This manifesto from Labour looks to me to begin to raise the question about where the state can run things that have been badly run more efficiently and at least give us some democratic control. We can't continue with the cronyism we've had over the last 10 years anyway. It's a shambles that has cost people jobs.
 
So Corbyn finally says he'd be neutral.

Why he didn't say so on ITV is beyond me. It's a sensible obvious position to take yet he allowed himself to be attacked because he was allergic to providing clarity.

Labour's Brexit position is by far and away the most sensible on offer but the way they've communicated it has been abysmal.

But he said that Johnson would be bogged down for years in negotiations but he would wave a wand and all done in 6 months.

Zippo credibility to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top