Your opinions on president Trump are just that, opinions. But using your logic supporting Hilary, a rape enabler with links to the KKK makes you equally open to criticism.
Referring to Mexicans as rapists, pardoning Joe Arpaio, talking about grabbing women's (you know the rest) and banning transgenders from the military. Which one of those is an opinion?
And Hillary. By Rape Enabler I presume you mean Kathy Shelton? In a case where she defended a guilty man 40 years ago after being appointed by a judge?
'Taylor [the rapist], 41, figured a jury would be less hostile to a rape defendant represented by a woman, according to one of his friends. Cummings [the judge] agreed to the request, scanned the list of available female attorneys (there were only a half dozen in the county at the time) and assigned Rodham, who had virtually no experience in criminal litigation.'
“Hillary told me she didn’t want to take that case, she made that very clear,” recalls prosecutor Gibson, who phoned her with the judge’s order.'
And Klan links, Senator Robert Byrd:
'It’s also true that Robert Byrd was a member of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1940s and helped establish the hate group’s chapter in Sophia, West Virginia. However, in 1952 Byrd avowed that “After about a year, I became disinterested [in the KKK], quit paying my dues, and dropped my membership in the organization,” and throughout his long political career (he served for 57 years in the United States Congress) he repeatedly apologized for his involvement with the KKK:'
So they're not really the same, are they? Historical cases with subsequent regret and renunciation of said behaviour, compared to current beliefs and actions, except maybe the 'grabbing' incident for which there is an apology. Ok, scratch mysoginistic. The list is still fairly astonishing.
