Current Affairs The Far Right

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sad to see fellow Blues apologising for left wing terrorists that beat up old men in wheelchairs. Sad.

C'mon i am not apologizing for them ffs you can't read. But if you think that's what i am doing then you are kind of doing the same for the far right....

Also i have said numerous times any violent perpetrator should be locked up.

What i disagree with is someone like you with an agenda defending fascists by claiming the "other side" are exactly the same.

There was about 1000 Fascists and kkk member who were ready to fight and kill and make their point. Many of those in acted violence unprovoked.

On the other side there were about the same 98% who were peaceful and the other 2% scum. I don't care what they call themselves the 2% are scum.

If you continue to say antifa are scum and the racist fascists are not to blame for all of the trouble then well. That's what i take issue with. You belittle and bemoan anyone who defends the left overall not antifa and yet you sit on your high perch defending the others. You keep suggested the left peaceful protesters are all antifa.
 
Not-so-Dandydan clearly has his own rather suspect agenda on this thread. He hasn't acknowledged a single point made by anyone else and thus has zero credibility.

File under: Troll, fascist sympathiser, racism apologist.
 
Dandy has moved in to the 'change my avatar to wind people up' phase. It seems to be the last phase before moving into the 'defending the indefensible is too tough so I'll jus stop posting' stage.
Although the lunacy is strong with this one, so who knows.

I noticed that on my last post. There's nothing worse than a troll pretending to be racist to rile people up and then trying to take the morale high ground when called out.
 
Tut tut, play the ball not the man folks. And face facts that your antifa boys have been causing trouble for the past 12 months by beating up anyone in a Trump hat.
But of course Trump is literally Hitler so i guess they bashed the fash.
 
Tut tut, play the ball not the man folks. And face facts that your antifa boys have been causing trouble for the past 12 months by beating up anyone in a Trump hat.
But of course Trump is literally Hitler so i guess they bashed the fash.

Let me see if I can explain the way I see it.

Antifa - made up of 'left-wingers' who covet inclusion, equality and a desire to see fascism and totalitarianism confronted. However a 'misguided minority' believe violence is the answer and are rightly condemned by yourself and 'left-wing' posters on this forum.

'Other side' - These recent problems with Antifa have come at rallies where the 'other side' is made up of people who hold deeply bigoted beliefs and can be classed as racists and in some cases Nazis (by their own admission). It's interesting to see that the main 'right-wing' are not involved here, it's like the 'other side' are made up of the polar political opposite of the 'misguided minority' from Antifa. They also have the acceptance, if not direct backing, of the POTUS (many fine people).

It seems to me the problem lies in naming the 'misguided minority' Antifa, tarring everyone in connected to Antifa (which itself appears to be a nebulous organisation with no real central structure), whereas the 'other side' get called 'alt-right' to differentiate them from 'normal right-wingers'. Unfair, right?

We could probably all agree on condemnation if in your argument you changed from using 'Antifa' to 'Alt-Left', giving a more balanced criticism.

So is it the same as tarring all Trump supporters with the same brush? Not really. Trump has shown himself to express jingoistic, xenophobic (at best, racist at worst), mysoginistic and homophobic tendencies. If you are ok with that and can get behind him, then you do open yourself to criticism.

I don't know, dandydan, if you are a Trump supporter or not. Your avatar and certain opinions you have expressed would lead me to believe so.

Is there anything wrong with what I've written here?

*looks at the ref while making a circle motion with both hands*
 
Told you the media were turning.
Check out @BevHillsAntifas Tweet:


Nothing said there was wrong. They shouldn't be branded as anti-fascist, 'they' being the people we just saw dishing out a beating, and on which they were commenting. They even alluded to other types of protesters, the man in the red shirt who helped the beaten man, acknowledging the fact the left-wing support may be more nuanced than you would have us believe.
 
Hypothetically speaking of course, What if the man is winding people up for kicks rather than making cogent points, then complains about the response, is it alright to call that man a 'snowflake'? Just curious.
The man has been interrupting the dominance of the opposition single handedly so had a hatchet job done on him. But he's still winning bigly.
 
Let me see if I can explain the way I see it.

Antifa - made up of 'left-wingers' who covet inclusion, equality and a desire to see fascism and totalitarianism confronted. However a 'misguided minority' believe violence is the answer and are rightly condemned by yourself and 'left-wing' posters on this forum.

'Other side' - These recent problems with Antifa have come at rallies where the 'other side' is made up of people who hold deeply bigoted beliefs and can be classed as racists and in some cases Nazis (by their own admission). It's interesting to see that the main 'right-wing' are not involved here, it's like the 'other side' are made up of the polar political opposite of the 'misguided minority' from Antifa. They also have the acceptance, if not direct backing, of the POTUS (many fine people).

It seems to me the problem lies in naming the 'misguided minority' Antifa, tarring everyone in connected to Antifa (which itself appears to be a nebulous organisation with no real central structure), whereas the 'other side' get called 'alt-right' to differentiate them from 'normal right-wingers'. Unfair, right?

We could probably all agree on condemnation if in your argument you changed from using 'Antifa' to 'Alt-Left', giving a more balanced criticism.

So is it the same as tarring all Trump supporters with the same brush? Not really. Trump has shown himself to express jingoistic, xenophobic (at best, racist at worst), mysoginistic and homophobic tendencies. If you are ok with that and can get behind him, then you do open yourself to criticism.

I don't know, dandydan, if you are a Trump supporter or not. Your avatar and certain opinions you have expressed would lead me to believe so.

Is there anything wrong with what I've written here?

*looks at the ref while making a circle motion with both hands*
Your opinions on president Trump are just that, opinions. But using your logic supporting Hilary, a rape enabler with links to the KKK makes you equally open to criticism.
 
The man has been interrupting the dominance of the opposition single handedly so had a hatchet job done on him. But he's still winning bigly.

What are you on about? The dominance of the opposition? What? Even when the democrats held power before Trump they were anything but dominant. The Republicans held the congress and partly the senate while Obama was president.

The only thing he has done is make a circus out of the Republican party and not actually accomplish anything.

Clearly you are a troll because your lack of knowledge is telling

Well its that or you are one of those conspiracy theorists from the right wing and judging by the rape enabler comment its just that.

Next you will tell us Hillary had involvement in that whole pizza place thing right? That nonsense about kid fiddling that was a bs story.

But honestly the fact you turned out to be one of those right wing loons is hardly surprising.

Keep up thew anti left pro right wing nutcase stuff won't you. Jesus wept.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top