The Epstein Files

What are you thoughts on the latest release

  • TL:DR

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • An almanac of rotten scoundrels

    Votes: 56 72.7%
  • Trumps downfall is coming

    Votes: 12 15.6%
  • All flatulence and no excrement

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • Cheesy dipsticks

    Votes: 3 3.9%

  • Total voters
    77
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm getting the opposite feeling.
Slowly mountbatts has had less and less to lose, so the details around others that make less headlines are starting to leak. epstein is going to have been trading insider info on stocks and government bonds for decades, it's not his criminality trafficking underage women that is the issue here - they're disposable - it's the evidence of financial fraud that's got backsides clenched. Everywhere has rules on ponzi schemes and dodgy finance, Everywhere.
I think financial misconduct is more likely to be the thing that sticks to Andrew; the more and more he's sidelined, one day the protection will flounder.
 
I don’t know if Chomsky was in on the sleaze but he kept contact with him after it all came out which is unforgivable.
I think that speaks to the networking genius that Epstein possessed. He inserted himself so successfully into people's lives as the man who knew someone who would get you want you wanted.

Basically, he was the chat gpt for the global elites. Easier to contact Jeff than think for myself. The after the conviction stuff is beyond grim.

If he wasn't the worst sex offender in history we wouldn't know any of this.
 
I think financial misconduct is more likely to be the thing that sticks to Andrew; the more and more he's sidelined, one day the protection will flounder.

I always wonder whether one of the Royal Protection detail will break ranks and start leaking stuff eventually.

I know they`re bound to an oath, but those lads must know everything !
 
I always wonder whether one of the Royal Protection detail will break ranks and start leaking stuff eventually.

I know they`re bound to an oath, but those lads must know everything !
It's a possibility, however I doubt it, unless they're likely to be brought into it. That's not a dig or saying they're corrupt, rather it's a very tricky position.

Hypothetically speaking, of course, a lot of protection details don't have the greatest relationship with some royals, but still they fulfil their role.
 
It's a possibility, however I doubt it, unless they're likely to be brought into it. That's not a dig or saying they're corrupt, rather it's a very tricky position.

Hypothetically speaking, of course, a lot of protection details don't have the greatest relationship with some royals, but still they fulfil their role.
I think this unlikely but If they are called to provide evidence to Congress on what they witnessed in the course of their duties can they legally refuse?
 
I think this unlikely but If they are called to provide evidence to Congress on what they witnessed in the course of their duties can they legally refuse?
I think unless they’ve been subpoenaed, they can refuse to testify, LL.

I love how some of these creeps got caught out, after this latest file dump.
View attachment 1.mp4
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top