The Epstein Files

What are you thoughts on the latest release

  • TL:DR

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • An almanac of rotten scoundrels

    Votes: 56 72.7%
  • Trumps downfall is coming

    Votes: 12 15.6%
  • All flatulence and no excrement

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • Cheesy dipsticks

    Votes: 3 3.9%

  • Total voters
    77
Status
Not open for further replies.
What do you make of Chomsky’s links? Some pretty grim reading.
I initially thought that some of the more famous academics mentioned or associating with Epstein were due to philanthropic reasons, as Epstein funded a lot of Harvard scientists (i.e., if some random rich benefactor said they wanted to independently fund someone's research, most academics would jump on the chance, as they don't have to spend time writing lengthy grant proposals in a highly competitive funding environment). But it turns out it is far more pernicious. For example, it has long been known that Epstein funded Martin Nowak, a mathematical biologist who did some interesting work on evolutionary theory. But if you google Martin Nowak and Epstein, it is just very creepy and weird!
 
The McSweeney fig leaf fallen off.

I imagine Starmer to be like this tonight...

dog-funny.gif
 
I initially thought that some of the more famous academics mentioned or associating with Epstein were due to philanthropic reasons, as Epstein funded a lot of Harvard scientists (i.e., if some random rich benefactor said they wanted to independently fund someone's research, most academics would jump on the chance, as they don't have to spend time writing lengthy grant proposals in a highly competitive funding environment). But it turns out it is far more pernicious. For example, it has long been known that Epstein funded Martin Nowak, a mathematical biologist who did some interesting work on evolutionary theory. But if you google Martin Nowak and Epstein, it is just very creepy and weird!
Yea I thought, or I guess wanted to think, when the link was first made public that Epstein liked surrounding himself with academics to make him seem more legitimate. I don’t know if Chomsky was in on the sleaze but he kept contact with him after it all came out which is unforgivable.
 
If this is going to bring down Starmer, it should also bring down the royals.

It won’t do either though.

McSweeny is probably the sacrificial lamb.
Think Starmer is toast tbh. Might drag out but as long as Epstein is in the news this will always serve as a reminder.

If he had any sense he should get ahead of the story and leave now.
 
I think we're slowly edging closer to something actually sticking.
I'm getting the opposite feeling.
Slowly mountbatts has had less and less to lose, so the details around others that make less headlines are starting to leak. epstein is going to have been trading insider info on stocks and government bonds for decades, it's not his criminality trafficking underage women that is the issue here - they're disposable - it's the evidence of financial fraud that's got backsides clenched. Everywhere has rules on ponzi schemes and dodgy finance, Everywhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top