The Epstein Files

What are you thoughts on the latest release

  • TL:DR

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • An almanac of rotten scoundrels

    Votes: 56 72.7%
  • Trumps downfall is coming

    Votes: 12 15.6%
  • All flatulence and no excrement

    Votes: 3 3.9%
  • Cheesy dipsticks

    Votes: 3 3.9%

  • Total voters
    77
Status
Not open for further replies.
For the infiltration and corruption of the Labour party maybe, for continuity post-Epstein with Oracle and Ellison perhaps, but imo he's just a cog in a larger network of hideous corrupt individuals facilitating abhorrent crimes on a local and National level using kompromat and further services as the lubricant for their ends, and make no mistake, I imagine the network is massive. Saville may have served a similar function.

It seems obvious that Blair maintains considerable control over the current incarnation of the Labour Party. Macsweeney did not act alone in proposing Mandelson as ambassador, they’ve gone ahead knowing he’s a wrongun, you’ve gotta ask yourself why?
 
ed davey with some rocket launcher allegations, not least the Polish secret service info that epstein was an agent for putin. Calling for a national inquiry. Why was badenoch so calm and quaint?



This is interesting also, rightly his links to Russia are being brought up by politicians, but not his links to a certain other Country?
 
The debate continues through Points of Order where its been shown that 'National Security' was not in each Humble Address. Also he was involved with Phil Shiner. Looks like he has misremembered a few things today.
 


A Labour prime minister was prepared to appoint the architect of austerity as ambassador to U.S.

Starmer knew about Mandelson’s continued relationship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, appointed him anyway.

Starmer and Mcsweeney need to go or it’s curtains for Labour. I’d be embarrassed if I was one of those people who come out batting for Starmer, as a few did on here.

From what I have seen online, there has been a non-stop drip of allegations and criticisms of Starmer and his dealing of them has been terrible and some of those allegations and criticisms have been proven out. I don't disagree with people who say that the previous 14 years had a parade of the corrupt, the incompetent and the downright cruel but not accepting that the same can be true of a Labour leader is putting your head in the sand.
 

This is interesting also, rightly his links to Russia are being brought up by politicians, but not his links to a certain other Country?

Has not been lost on me that LBC, the telegraph, and Sky have all started pushing the Russia angle, yet no word on Israel when all the evidence is clearly there, dating back to the 80s,
 
Lets follow the Epstein grilling on PMQs with a question about Childrens Breakfast clubs. Am I the only one who sees that as extremely short sighted?
Some of them have had clinics and town/school meeting minutes prepared from last week, they are still accountable to the time they've spent prior during and after the mandelson documents landed. Yes it feels tertiary, but is par for the course in spite of recent revelations.

Pop parliament live on (BBC Parliament freeview 232) as them that didn't get a question in PMQ's are unloading their bombs now.
 
The debate continues through Points of Order where its been shown that 'National Security' was not in each Humble Address. Also he was involved with Phil Shiner. Looks like he has misremembered a few things today.
bang 232 on quick, russian money. did mandelson furnish russia (putin) with insider financial info via epstein.

This 'national security' issue is going to be a bun fight.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top