tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
it’s the governments responsibility; that’s why the bloke resigned
Current Affairs The Conservative Party
- Thread starter Ashtonian
- Start date
- Status
it’s the governments responsibility; that’s why the bloke resigned
Does some of that come from expectations of what a woman should be like in a workplace?
Do some people react differently to aPriti Patel swearing to a Boris Johnson?
And if she is an awful person, is it actually bullying and deserving of being sacked in disgrace? Until there's specifics, I'm not sure how anyone can be conclusive in their view.
Usually a report has a summary from whoever produced/wrote the report. Isn't that the guy who resigned? If not, you'd have thought he'd ensure there would be a summary for the world to see.
Thing is mate, she was found to have broken the ministerial code by an independent investigation.
That should be enough. The guy who did the investigation has resigned due to Johnson basically ignoring it.
It doesn't actually matter the specifics of what she did; what matters is an investigation found her guilty of breaking the code, and therefore she should resign or be sacked.
Have you read that code?
Skim through it.
They'd all be sacked.
Specifics and context always matter.
No I think it largely comes from her being a bully and a hypocrite.
NilSatisOptimum
Player Valuation: £70m
There is no accountability in a corrupt cabal. Tis why only a one page summary is to published on the bullying Inquiry into behaviours of only the HOME SECURITY.
Also, pending court case will be settled as they always are in constructive dismissal cases. So specifics little chance.
That's "whataboutery", but even if so, have anyone subject to the same investigation then.
Patel was the one who did so much as to merit an investigation being called. She was "guilty as charged" on this. She should go.
Sure, lots of it is agenda driven as per usual, but objectively she should resign or be sacked over this as the correct course of action. Johnson hasn't followed procedure. He's whitewashing it. Hence the furore.
I see mate.
I'm sure she's alone then in being the only bully and hypocrite in government.
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
He wrote a summary yes, but we don’t know whether what was released today is all the summary, an edited highlights or something that captures the flavour of what No.10 thought it said. His resignation kind of suggests an answer though.
There's always furore.
People outside of shouty platforms don't really care.
Some will even admire the lack of pandering to a media pile on. Some loyalty.
All besides the point.
Until there's specifics I don't see how anyone can be so condemning and conclusive.
"She broke the code! The code!"
Go and read the code.
It's like Momentum in Labour shouting about Tory Islamophobia when questioned about their own anti-semitism.
Sure, it exists... but you're still anti-semitic at the end of the day.
This is like Starmer ignorning the EHRC report, going "ah well, nobody knows exactly what anti-semitic things people said when and where" and trying to get on with things. There's be uproar, and correctly so.
Johnson and Patel deserve all they're getting here, because Patel shouldn't have a job right now.
Why shouldn't she?
She shouted, swore and made some people feel uncomfortable?
That's all we have isn't it?
Alan Whittle
Player Valuation: £70m
She’s certainly the only one that’s been the subject of a report that has been suppressed by the Prime Minister.
No, she was found guilty of breaking the ministerial code. That's what we have and all we need to know she should be gone.
Otherwise what's the point in having an independent investigation if you're just going to ignore the outcome of it completely. At that point you're basically Jeremy Corbyn.
- Status