Current Affairs The Conservative Party

Status
Not open for further replies.
...I wouldn’t be surprised if Priti Patel turns rogue.
I reckon our government were/are misleading parliament and invalidating the EU imperative not to discuss trade deals with third parties.

She could squeal, and May knows it, hence the sickly-sweet letter in response to the resignation.
 
Opinion
Don’t be distracted by the chaos at No 10. The real problem is rotten ideology
Owen-Jones,-L.png

Owen Jones
It’s not just the bungling of Johnson and Patel that is sinking the Tory ship. It’s also the dead weight of their neoliberal politics


Wednesday 8 November 2017 19.42 GMTLast modified on Thursday 9 November 201707.51 GMT

This isn’t a government, it’s a parody of one. Theresa May has the trappings, residence and salary of a prime minister,but little else. It’s like Night of the Living Dead meets Fawlty Towers, where the politically undead govern with an almost unwatchable level of farce.

This is a decaying administration with no unifying programme, whose leading figures increasingly loathe each other on both ideological and personal grounds. They pretend to govern purely out of fear that, if they do not, their opponents really will. It is the terror – and “terror” is the correct word to describe how they feel – of a Jeremy Corbyn government assuming office that keeps them from imploding altogether.

It’s often called a zombie government, but if you watch a zombie flick, you will notice that the undead have a sense of purpose – going after the enemy – and they don’t turn on each other. The Tories would love to be in such a position.

Their dilemma is thus. From the 1970s onwards, the party established a new order based on privatisation, deregulation, an assault on collective organising, and slashing taxes on the rich and corporate Britain. In the aftermath of the cold war and the surrender of social democracy to neoliberalism, Tories told themselves their order would last for ever.

fight a life-saving EU tobacco control directivebecause it hit the profits of tobacco merchants.

It is a national humiliation that this sort of character, who offers only twisted ideological zeal and naked self-advancement in place of ability and basic decency, became one of our most powerful politicians. We know she apparently set her up own freelance foreign policy (though it is not clear exactly what No 10 knew and when), visited the illegally occupied Golan Heights, and offered to shower British aid money on an Israeli army currently enforcing a brutal occupation. Patel did this because she knows May’s career is a festering carcass, and she is among the many circling vultures.

Quick Guide
Priti Patel's fall from grace
And now that Patel has resigned, how can Boris Johnson remain as foreign secretary? His extensive back catalogue of lying, bigotry and general charlatanry would, in a world which did not favour the malign and self-serving, have precluded him from the post of Britain’s chief international representative. It is criminal that this media-created buffoon was allowed to take a position which, because his self-regard is only matched by his incompetence, could have cost Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe another four years in an Iranian prison.

That should haunt Johnson for the rest of his life. It won’t – he’s beyond shameless. But it should torture May until her final days. Is she really, deep down, so shocked that this disaster could have happened when she herself appointed him foreign secretary?

However, Labour should not be complacent. Yes, the political winds are on the party’s side; yes, it began an election campaign 24 points behind and almost drew level the Tories within six weeks. But despite the Tories’ meltdown, this shambolic party of government still polls around 40%.

These supporters are an overlapping coalition of wealthy voters, older voters who have been protected from the extremes of austerity, and the socially conservative. They are united not behind any inspiring Tory vision, but a fear of a leftwing departure from the status quo. A decisive Labour victory – and the end of this social order – is possible, though far from inevitable, and it still has to be fought for.

But good grief. When has a governing party in British history inflicted such damage on itself, from the EU referendum to the snap election, merely because of crude attempts at gaining party advantage? Britain is currently facing one of its greatest challenges since the second world war. At the same time, we have the most chaotic, divided, farcical administration in our modern history.

To her credit, after David Cameron’s downfall, May understood that the political tide was shifting. On her wall hangs the speech she made on her first day in No 10 about the great injustices afflicting British society. And the preamble of the 2017 Conservative party manifesto did, wisely, accept that the public appetite for free market fundamentalism was not there.

But the sad reality for the Tories – though happily for the nation – is that a party ideologically wedded to a failed economic and political settlement has no answers. Sure, this surreal performance art masquerading as a government will be remembered for incompetence. But let’s not forget that it was New Labour – despite some humanising tweaks – and the Tories who propped up this crumbling order. That’s the real story here, not the hopeless and the helpless scurrying around a sinking Tory ship, occasionally throwing each other overboard.

When they finally defenestrate May – it could be at any moment – the Conservative party will try to pin every calamity on her. Don’t let them. It’s the Tories’ rotten ideology that lies at the root of this government’s existential crisis. And the task ahead – which will prove one of the most challenging missions in British history – is to build a new social order instead.

I'll take Owen Jones and raise you a Dani Rodrik - http://bostonreview.net/class-inequality/dani-rodrik-rescuing-economics-neoliberalism

"That neoliberalism is a slippery, shifting concept, with no explicit lobby of defenders, does not mean that it is irrelevant or unreal. Who can deny that the world has experienced a decisive shift toward markets from the 1980s on? Or that center-left politicians—Democrats in the United States, Socialists and Social Democrats in Europe—enthusiastically adopted some of the central creeds of Thatcherism and Reaganism, such as deregulation, privatization, financial liberalization, and individual enterprise? Much of our contemporary policy discussion remains infused with norms and principles supposedly grounded in homo economicus.

But the looseness of the term neoliberalism also means that criticism of it often misses the mark. There is nothing wrong with markets, private entrepreneurship, or incentives—when deployed appropriately. Their creative use lies behind the most significant economic achievements of our time. As we heap scorn on neoliberalism, we risk throwing out some of neoliberalism’s useful ideas.

The real trouble is that mainstream economics shades too easily into ideology, constraining the choices that we appear to have and providing cookie-cutter solutions. A proper understanding of the economics that lies behind neoliberalism would allow us to identify—and to reject—ideology when it masquerades as economic science. Most importantly it would help us develop the institutional imagination we badly need to redesign capitalism for the twenty-first century."
 
This thread title is part of the problem: "scummy" tories is abuse, it's placing your fellow man as Untermensch, making it easier to dismiss them and their views, which makes them and their supporters more combative, and in the end it makes it ever more difficult to find common ground to fix the issues of the day.

The idea of self-fulfilling prophecy comes to mind.
 
This thread title is part of the problem: "scummy" tories is abuse, it's placing your fellow man as Untermensch, making it easier to dismiss them and their views, which makes them and their supporters more combative, and in the end it makes it ever more difficult to find common ground to fix the issues of the day.

The idea of self-fulfilling prophecy comes to mind.
there's no live and let live with rats
 
there's no live and let live with rats

There won't be if you see them as rats. The Tories have been in power for the majority of recent history, and the more its supporters are abused by those on opposite ideological sides, the more they'll double-down on their support and make sure to turn up to vote.

As much as I hate Blair for his involvement in Iraq, he was clever enough to identify and promote a third way which got Labour back in power.
 
There won't be if you see them as rats. The Tories have been in power for the majority of recent history, and the more its supporters are abused by those on opposite ideological sides, the more they'll double-down on their support and make sure to turn up to vote.

As much as I hate Blair for his involvement in Iraq, he was clever enough to identify and promote a third way which got Labour back in power.
getting into bed with scum, yeah okay sound
 
The 'prime' minister can't even fix her own make-up ffs.

I have no issue with changing the thread title, but think twice about who's been demonising whom -- our inglorious leader was only last night celebrating with one of the major culprits.
This thread title is part of the problem: "scummy" tories is abuse, it's placing your fellow man as Untermensch, making it easier to dismiss them and their views, which makes them and their supporters more combative, and in the end it makes it ever more difficult to find common ground to fix the issues of the day.

The idea of self-fulfilling prophecy comes to mind.
 
John Smith would've won the 1997 election.

Hard to say. Personally I agreed with almost everything he stood for, but not sure if most of the country did. I wonder how different things would've been had he survived and won. Blairitism kept the tories out for 13 years, after all.
 
Hard to say. Personally I agreed with almost everything he stood for, but not sure if most of the country did. I wonder how different things would've been had he survived and won. Blairitism kept the tories out for 13 years, after all.
Smith certainly would have won 1997, there was just a massive surge for change...it's more uncertain if he would have won 2 more elections after that...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top