Basically because they cannot accept a democratic vote!i'm still amazed at how low lib dems are polling...
Basically because they cannot accept a democratic vote!i'm still amazed at how low lib dems are polling...
I cant even comprehend johnson vs corbyn in a debate, utterly bizarre..
ruth davidson would win easy, not even an mp tho is she? also...not sure the tory membership would fancy a lesbian scot...
policy wise?Ruth Davidson is the Tory Dan Jarvis - ie: they like the idea of her, she has a great story, but noone actually knows what she is like.
It's not really baffling at all. It's the Corbyn factor. People either love him and vote labour or hate him and vote tory to stop him.
This is the prime minister of the country though, not the X-Factor.
Tim is right though - the fact that the Tory vote is holding at around 40% can only be understood as an anti-Corbyn vote; if it was based on their own achievements and competence they would be hovering around 15-20%.
You could make the argument about Labour's vote too though. It's hard to believe that the Blairites support the direction Momentum has taken the party in, yet equally they can't vote for a Brexiteering Tory party.
You could make that argument, but not with any real chance of success. If the past two years tell us anything about Labour, its that the Blairites represent a tiny fraction of the public.
This is the prime minister of the country though, not the X-Factor.
I know you're a signed up Corbynista, but I think the argument has strong merits. Blair won many elections from the centre ground. Cameron worked hard to move the Tories to the centre and against the loonies in the party. Even France has elected what amounts to a Blairite in opposition to those on either extreme.
To suggest those in the centre ground of political discourse have vanished and you're left with either card carrying socialists or Brexiteering nationalists is a bit far stretched imo.
You didn't say "centre ground", though. You said "Blairite" - which should suggest a set of policies (neoliberalism, an interventionist foreign policy, laissez-faire regulation, academies, tuition fees, increased privatization, PFI, increasing migration to keep wages down etc) that aren't popular and aren't really from "the centre" either.
Blair is the most centrist Labour leader there has ever been, as he was the first to accept that the market is a good thing. He moved Labour to the centre economically, and Cameron moved the Tories to the centre socially.
Blair is the most centrist Labour leader there has ever been, as he was the first to accept that the market is a good thing. He moved Labour to the centre economically, and Cameron moved the Tories to the centre socially.
Ted Heath eh?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.