The example the right likes to cite is when someone came into a church in Texas and opened fire with a shotgun. The first person to pull a pistol, located near the shooter, was shot and killed. A deacon then was shot before another member of the congregation serving as volunteer security put the shooter down with a shot to the head from a single round once he had a clear line of sight.Please forgive me if I'm wrong, but has there ever been an occasion when a gun carrying member of the public has ever stopped a mass shooter. I don't ever remember one.
The example the right likes to cite is when someone came into a church in Texas and opened fire with a shotgun. The first person to pull a pistol, located near the shooter, was shot and killed. A deacon then was shot before another member of the congregation serving as volunteer security put the shooter down with a shot to the head from a single round once he had a clear line of sight.
This tells me two things. If you pull a weapon and are seen, you move right up to the top of the shooter's hit list. Also, if you aren't a marksman, the gun doesn't do a lot of good in a crowded setting. You're as likely to take down your own as the target.
Should the church have armed, trained volunteer security? Sure. These are the kind of people who should have permits to carry. Should the congregation have random armed members of the congregation? Probably not.

There do seem to be quite a few churchgoers in the US who skipped "turn the other cheek" day at Sunday school.
Sadly this is the reality.Never
Nothing will ever be done
To be fair, there are also quite a few churchgoers in the US who subscribe to nothing that was taught in the New TestamentThere do seem to be quite a few churchgoers in the US who skipped "turn the other cheek" day at Sunday school.
To be fair, there are also quite a few churchgoers in the US who subscribe to nothing that was taught in the New Testament
Yes especially Leviticus. Specifically the bit about a man lying with another as he would a woman being an abomination before god and all that.These same folks also like to pick and choose from the Old Testament as it pleases them
Not to mention when the police show up, looking for a shooter, and find an armed person.The example the right likes to cite is when someone came into a church in Texas and opened fire with a shotgun. The first person to pull a pistol, located near the shooter, was shot and killed. A deacon then was shot before another member of the congregation serving as volunteer security put the shooter down with a shot to the head from a single round once he had a clear line of sight.
This tells me two things. If you pull a weapon and are seen, you move right up to the top of the shooter's hit list. Also, if you aren't a marksman, the gun doesn't do a lot of good in a crowded setting. You're as likely to take down your own as the target.
Should the church have armed, trained volunteer security? Sure. These are the kind of people who should have permits to carry. Should the congregation have random armed members of the congregation? Probably not.
| Federal lawsuit against the Midlothian Police Officer, and the Village of Midlothian which alleges excessive force during an unprovoked, unjustified,and unreasonable shooting |
Which is why we have Ambrose Bierce's definition of Christian:To be fair, there are also quite a few churchgoers in the US who subscribe to nothing that was taught in the New Testament
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.