RFUS
Anustart
It makes me laugh when some think they're coming to "reasonable" conclusions when they're constantly having premptive moans .
Its agenda filled drivel really mate. Like I said. If he said we're in Europe - he'd be criticised. If he said nothing - he'd be criticised. If he said something cautiously optimistic - he'd be criticised.
RFUS is one who'd criticise him either way. Then say he's "reasonable"
*rolls eyes*
...
Ratings
Moyes - 7:
The good:
- Started Drenthe
- Dropped Timmy and put Ossie in his best role. The result on our style of play was dramatic and crucially, effective.
- Gave Gueye a good run out and played most of the game with him AND Royston on.
- Had us playing much better football, and for the first time in ages I actually enjoyed one of our games.
The bad:
- Started a not fully-fit Coleman, in the process also inhibiting Drenthe (in my opinion) by playing him on the left where he is less effective. Although still effective mind, I think having our two best creative outlets on the same wing makes us more predictable.
- Phil Neville in CM. All game, every game.
- McFadden on the bench over McAleny and Vellios. Barkley stayed on the bench, but hopefully we'll see him out there again soon.
- Some overly defensive things still persist. First of all he still gets every man back for corners, regardless of the scoreline or the opposition. Surely Drenthe would be more effective near the half way line, so we could have the chance to counter? Secondly, why is no one getting into the box? One killer Baines cross was delivered to genuinely no one, as our support is slow and often non-existent. Finally when we did score we seemed to change our style of play a bit and sit off a bit more, almost inviting pressure. I suppose you could argue that we were trying to counter but with our support being so slow and not forthcoming, I don't see that one working out.
See the way I included positives AND negatives?
You know, the basis of any reasonable argument.








