royalbalou
Player Valuation: £25m
The guy with the foreign-sounding name has gotta be better, stands to reason.....
Scott Dann; good defender, proved himself as capable in the Premier League and a tall mountain in the prime of his career. But he's not good enough for a team that believe we should be challenging in the top 7 or 8.
Everyone keeps hammering on about us not showing ambition in the transfer market, but then they're willing to settle for Crystal Palace's POTY. I think he's good, but i'd much rather we spent the 10m on a defender that will improve the starting XI.
And POTY means nothing at a club, Heitinga was ours one year, the following year he was awful!
But we're not going to get a defender who improves the starting XI - as Stones and Jags are the first-choice pairing, and so they should be.
Why not?
Why buy players who have no chance of displacing the current XI? You want players that are good enough to push into the starting line up otherwise what's the damn point of it all!?
But we're not going to get a defender who improves the starting XI - as Stones and Jags are the first-choice pairing, and so they should be.
Why not?
Why buy players who have no chance of displacing the current XI? You want players that are good enough to push into the starting line up otherwise what's the damn point of it all!?
A bit like when Heitinga was earning top whack despite having no chance of being picked ahead of Jagielka or Distin when they were fit.Why not?
Why buy players who have no chance of displacing the current XI? You want players that are good enough to push into the starting line up otherwise what's the damn point of it all!?
But we're not going to get a defender who improves the starting XI - as Stones and Jags are the first-choice pairing, and so they should be.
Why not?
Why buy players who have no chance of displacing the current XI? You want players that are good enough to push into the starting line up otherwise what's the damn point of it all!?
Of course that's the point - but I don't think Martinez is looking for a defender who is better than what we've already got because they would be incredibly expensive. Someone of Dann's ilk would be a good signing I think - for the right price, obviously - I wouldn't want us to pay more than £6mil for him really, but I do think he's a good defender.
Of course that's the point - but I don't think Martinez is looking for a defender who is better than what we've already got because they would be incredibly expensive. Someone of Dann's ilk would be a good signing I think - for the right price, obviously - I wouldn't want us to pay more than £6mil for him really, but I do think he's a good defender.
Thats like saying whats the point in having more than 18 players in a squad every season.
They probably don't want to, any more than I imagine we want to sell Mirallas.The quoted price is £8m-£10m+ which is an insane price tag for him. The biggest problem is why would Palace sell him for £6m? This is not gong to happen.
That's what scouts are for mate. Jagielka, Baines, Coleman, Stones all cost less than the money being quoted for Dann.
Is it?
Is it really that insane? He was their best player last season, why would they want to lose their best player without decent compensation? Jags was about the same age when arsenal came in for him at £10m. We all thought they were being cheeky *******. Prices have gone up since.The quoted price is £8m-£10m+ which is an insane price tag for him. The biggest problem is why would Palace sell him for £6m? This is not gong to happen.