Thats not the reason you posted the graph though mate - the graph you posted just highlighted activity - if you really wanted you could show that the increased WHU activity - pro rata was probably the same as ours pound for unit.
Yes i definitely do think 80% of that list - in fact probably more get games here. 100%, I've no reason to retract the comment, you are just repeating it. Demari Gray and Maupay up front and Danjuma out on the wing, we aren't turning our nose up at the players on that list - yet the difference is £160 mill in expenditure. My question was £ for £ who got the better value for the investment/expenditure and without question its WHU.
So if you dont want to replicate WHU last five years - what is your Expectation?
Baseline ive presented how they finished higher in the PL, earned Euro Football, Won a Trophy, Turned over £250 mill a year and generated 500 mill to spend on their squad in turn having a squad of sellable assets? I dont think there are many Blues turning their nose up at that if im being honest with you.
I dont think you really from this point in the next five years - that our expectation realistically should be higher then that?
Frankly, I'm astonished anyone can look at the list of players there and think that's a good effort, or that 80% would improve us.
There's 2 centre Half's there for £70m+ who wouldn't get in our squad.
You keep going back to Evertons recruitment the past few years and making comparisons, neglecting the context of our position. Having to sell/make profit every window. Having to sign players for £0 or £0 upfront. We've not had the luxury West Ham have had.
Forgetting any attempt at comparison - just looking at West Hams signings the last 5 years is enough.
There's a reason they're on their arse at the moment, and have been for a couple of seasons now.








