He can play deep, break up play and close others down mate, hes a busy little player in the Jimmy Bullard mode - he always on the go.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications.
To install our app on Android
To install this app on iOS
He can play deep, break up play and close others down mate, hes a busy little player in the Jimmy Bullard mode - he always on the go.
What is this parallel universe where David Vaughan is considered a good signing???????????????
Who Neiler? Vaughan?


Vaughan has good stats, but he'd get nowhere near the first team ahead of Fellaini, Rodwell and Neville. He's too old to be just a squad man. Klose is way out of our league.
I like Larsson but we've got Coleman, Arteta, Osman, Gueye, Anichebe and Bily who can play in the wide areas. He's not different enough to what we already have.
Roe-Coker wouldn't improve us.
Michael Owen is too injury prone.
Matthew Upson is awful. If he doesn't stay at West Ham I think he'll move down rather than up the league.
Scholes will retire from playing.
Carew might retire because of injury too.
Phillips is too old.
Taylor-Fletcher isn't good enough for us.
I like Gilks but he's had a serious knee injury.
Bosingwa has resigned for Chelsea.
It would have to be a pay as you play deal for Hargreaves.
Barnes has previously shown promise, but his career is slipping away.
Dyer is too injury prone.
Caldwell isn't good enough.
Vaughan is 28 and IMO a better midfielder than Rodders and Neville. Ive seen Vaughan a bit for Blackpool alongside Adam and he's a very good ball player and as very good vision and long & short passing range and can spread the play and he's the kind of player we havent got in our squad and i think he'd be a decent freebie, he wouldnt be a regular but someone we could count on, he's a decent little player.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.