We may be about to find out as it seems that at least some of the sales weren’t margin calls

Why not, it points out the hypocrisy and illogic of Musk’s comments about being able to sell things you don’t own?Musk is on the money and that reply merits no attention.
Why not, it points out the hypocrisy and illogic of Musk’s comments about being able to sell things you don’t own?
I think there are many things you can be critical about in how shorting is abused in practice but the concept itself, of trading things you don’t own at that particular time, I don’t have much of a problem with.
I mentioned earlier in this thread about this. This guy is incorrect in most of what he says but the final point is correct. Citadel don't own Melvin but were one of the 2 hedge funds to bail them out this week (along with Point72). They also don't own Robinhood but are the biggest buyers of their order flow (which is basically the only way RH makes money).So apparently Citadel owns both Robin Hood and Melvin Capital (one of the hedge funds involved in the short squeeze).
![]()
He might have owned the means of manufacture (although iirc some of the time he used the pre-orders to get financing to even build the factories/alter existing production or buy materials so even that is a tad questionabl) but he still didn’t own the cars that he sold pre-orders on ie he still traded an asset he did not own at that time.As the replies to that dimwitted tweet point out, Musk owns the factories that produce the cars that will be sold.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.