The 2nd goal?From where I was it looked like it was Distin's?
Germaine Jenas hit the nail on the head. If we turn it over because Baines and Coleman are so far forward they're running at out CBs which forces everyone to play safe. I've always said with Martinez I fear conceeding more when we have the ball than when we don't.
...
I'm not sure how to change it but I would start by keeping one of Coleman or Baines back until the ball goes into our attacking four.
The 2nd goal?
Barry lost it in midfield and then they where running through 5 on 2.
It's not like the pass into Barry was dangerous, he had options to move it on faster but like what was happening all day he as with the rest of the team he wanted too many touches.
I just hate it, EFFING HATE IT, the way we play most of the time from the back; Howard to a centre back, to a full back, to a centre back, to the other centre back, to Barry, to Baines, to Distin, to Howard, to Jagielka, long, lost possession. When we're losing like today, instead of killing a minute fannying around before going long, why not just go long in the first place?
Because in Roberto's world, if we have the possession the opposition can't score, so by keeping majority possession at least the opposition will have fewer chances. So, in today's game, say the ball was in play for 60 minutes then we had it in our possession for around 37 minutes compared to Spurs's 23. So, we should be winning games. Simple isn't it? Unfortunately the key missing factor is of course what you do with your 14 extra minutes on the ball.I just hate it, EFFING HATE IT, the way we play most of the time from the back; Howard to a centre back, to a full back, to a centre back, to the other centre back, to Barry, to Baines, to Distin, to Howard, to Jagielka, long, lost possession. When we're losing like today, instead of killing a minute fannying around before going long, why not just go long in the first place?
Not really bothered about the pen because we were so bad and deserved nothing but........LOL MOTD2 says no penalty..........
Then there is a steep drop off and Howard is in the same category as Begovic.
Someone in the CBS coverage here in the states said they thought Kane intentionally hooked his foot around Besic looking for the pen. Don't know about it being intentional, but Kane is every bit the snide that Besic is and maybe more. The only call from that game I'm still curious about is Kane appearing to come from behind Barry at the end of the first half. US broadcast and pundits didn't break down either why that tackle was clean or why it should have been a foul. Would like to be educated about that.I thought it was a pen but I thought their coverage was dead on including calling the Besic one as a tangle of legs.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.