I don't buy the whole London thing 100%. It's a factor ... I don't deny it. However you know on Dragon's Den/Shark Tank when some noob comes on and talks about the size of a market and the dragons laugh at them? Like "soft drinks are a 100 billion a year market so we have created a new soda" ... the small aspect of taking away market share from Coke and Pepsi is a mere afterthought in their "business plan."
Of course London is bigger and has more money than Liverpool. But what would the new Fulham owners strategy be to take away from Chelsea, Arsenal and Spurs? Not to mention QPR, West Ham etc. Fulham need a new stadium/renovation just like we do.
If the master plan is to take serious share away from the London CL contenders it will have to involve spending crazy money. His net worth is apparently 2.5b. He just spent $760 million on the Jags. If he was willing to spend that much on Fulham he'd get a new stadium and a few great players but there are no guarantees. I think he'd still be behind the established London clubs.
This man purchased an NFL team in Jacksonville. Jacksonville! Pretty much the least appealing NFL city in the league. Liverpool is so many levels above Jacksonville in "standing" that it would be very strange for this guy to be willing to spend $760 million on a team in freakin' Jacksonville yet be scared of the idea of buying a team from Liverpool.
50% (which is attainable in a few years of CL Everton) of Liverpool v. 5-10% of London ... that's worth more serious consideration than just saying "it's London." Not to mention the fact that we're significantly closer than Fulham to having a CL quality team.
... obviously something else is going on. Most of us know what that is but it seems some people are still having trouble.
... that said I'm not too sad on missing out on this guy specifically ... it's more annoying in general that we obviously aren't for sale.
Good post. For what it's worth, a big chunk of my whole London argument though was down to the # of companies based there. A large part of the rationale behind building a new stadium is to have better corporate facilities to attract the higher spending of those kind of prawn munchers.
Yet even with those extra facilities, Kirkby was estimated to be bringing in around £5m extra per season. To put that into context, every one of the 26 or so home games at Arsenal is said to bring in £3m, or £78m a season. No idea how much Highbury earnt them, but it's not hard to predict they'll be earning a bit more than £5m extra per season.
Of course a big chunk of that could be the higher ticket prices London folks can stomach (the most expensive ticket is 3x what ours is), but also the corporate income they get. A whole lot more companies are based in London than in Liverpool, so getting a slice of that pie must be easier.