I'm not party to the negotiations so I have no idea who is to blame or not (incidentally, my wife and many of her colleagues are actually coming to oppose the strikes because of the rhetoric from the nurses union, none of which will actually get to the heart of the problem, which is a lack of staff, not how much they're paid). My point is that the unions always want to punish customers in the hope that the employer cares more about annoyed customers than they do. It's not right. None of this is the customer/end users fault, and yet they suffer all the time, and they'll suffer from the higher pay that will inevitably result from this because the costs will be passed on through higher ticket prices (that are already the highest in Europe).
Mick Lynch has put into the domain what they have been doing, and it's very shady. A 4% pay offer, when theyve lost control of inflation is awful. Ordinary working people have already paid the penalty of inflation as well.
Re your wife, if you increase pay, you will attract more people, who it's actually quite a simple equation. We lose a lot of staff to going abroad. Brexit has been disastrous, so too has been the anti migrant rhetoric (unfortunately now being copied by Starmer). But again, the government seem to think they can take the proverbial and decent people who just put up with it indefinitely.
I dont think any worker on strike is motivated by trying to punish anybody. They have been pushed into a corner, by 10 years of falling wages by economic mismanagement (austerity, Brexit then latterly Truss) which has now also seen inflation. They want to be able to live without having to rely on food banks. Essentially they want some degree of basic dignity.
At some point regarding the rail, or the energy companies, or the water companies, we may need to ask the question if we may benefit from some democratic control over these services, as they have on the continent. Shareholder ownership seems to provide a woeful service, very expensive, but the shareholders always get their payment.
Yet if the people who run these services ask for pay to remain stable in real terms, apparently its them who are the issue. I just dont buy it mate. It's the government.